RE: [Flashcoders] Fjax... does this seem ridiculous to anyone els e?

2006-06-23 Thread Dave Watts
Of course I am not an ajax programmer, but if its as hard as they say, and if it makes it easier for ajax programmers to code then why not? AJAX programming is not hard at all, as long as you know JavaScript and a server-side programming language. There's no need to have your server-side

RE: [Flashcoders] Fjax... does this seem ridiculous to anyone els e?

2006-06-23 Thread Steven Sacks | BLITZ
AJAX is just a buzzword anyway. The methodology has been around forever. ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig

Re: [Flashcoders] Fjax... does this seem ridiculous to anyone els e?

2006-06-23 Thread hank williams
AJAX programming is not hard at all, as long as you know JavaScript and a server-side programming language. There's no need to have your server-side programming language return XML, either, so this is a solution in search of a problem. Lol. So the whole thing about their code eliminating the

RE: [Flashcoders] Fjax... does this seem ridiculous to anyone els e?

2006-06-23 Thread Dave Watts
Lol. So the whole thing about their code eliminating the differences between browsers is huey huh?! Yeah, pretty much. There's very little about using XmlHTTPRequest that's browser-dependent. If you're doing anything significant with the data you return via AJAX, that's where you're more

RE: [Flashcoders] Fjax... does this seem ridiculous to anyone els e?

2006-06-23 Thread Palmer, Jim
Dave has it right - the only issue on browser dependency I've found was with sending hefty packets via the xmlhttprequest... beyond the browser actually supporting the call in the first place. The biggest hurdle I found was the space character being presented as a + character when using Safari.