>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JesterXL
>>Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 3:52 PM
>>To: Flashcoders mailing list
>>Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flash 8 grossly inflates .flv file?
&g
ge-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JesterXL
>>Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 3:11 PM
>>To: Flashcoders mailing list
>>Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flash 8 grossly inflates .flv file?
>>
>>No one ever
5-359-1750
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Merrill, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 3:16 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Flash 8 grossly inflates .flv file?
I think both codecs did about the same.
Jason Merrill |
:15 PM
>>To: Flashcoders mailing list
>>Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flash 8 grossly inflates .flv file?
>>
>>actually I think Spark might produce a larger asset than On2 :/
>>
>>Let us know.
>>
>>edolecki
>>
>>On 11/21/05, JesterXL <[EMAI
ers mailing list
>>Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flash 8 grossly inflates .flv file?
>>
>>No one ever does it seems. You're best bet is to use Spark then,
although,
>>the size will still be unnacceptable.
NOTICE:
This message is for the designated recipient only and may c
ginal Message -
> From: "Merrill, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Flashcoders mailing list"
> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 3:00 PM
> Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Flash 8 grossly inflates .flv file?
>
>
> Yeah - I agree with the quality - I
to:flashcoders-
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of eric dolecki
>>Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 1:27 PM
>>To: Flashcoders mailing list
>>Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flash 8 grossly inflates .flv file?
>>
>>Wow - the quality of that video is very poor. There is ar
dolecki
>>Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 1:27 PM
>>To: Flashcoders mailing list
>>Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flash 8 grossly inflates .flv file?
>>
>>Wow - the quality of that video is very poor. There is artifacting all
over
>>the place, which tells me this has
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of eric dolecki
> >>Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 12:49 PM
> >>To: Flashcoders mailing list
> >>Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flash 8 grossly inflates .flv file?
> >>
> >>Do you have a file handy for us to try out?
> >&g
n Behalf Of eric dolecki
>>Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 12:49 PM
>>To: Flashcoders mailing list
>>Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flash 8 grossly inflates .flv file?
>>
>>Do you have a file handy for us to try out?
>>
>>edolecki
NOTICE:
This message
nal Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JesterXL
>>Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 12:49 PM
>>To: Flashcoders mailing list
>>Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flash 8 grossly inflates .flv file?
>>
>>You mean WAVE, r
Do you have a file handy for us to try out?
edolecki
On 11/21/05, Merrill, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I didn't get a response on FlashComm, so I'll try here:
>
>
>
> Why would converting a 3mb .wmv file to .flv using Flash 8's video
>
> importer balloon it to a whopping 37mb??? I am usi
You mean WAVE, right? If you mean WMV, then you got lucky this never
happened in MX 2004. If video is already compressed, it'll confuse the
codec compressing it, and usually you'll end up with a bigger file than you
started with. If you don't, the video will usually worse.
Unless you have th
13 matches
Mail list logo