haXe is not only Flash. You can use the same language to develop the
JavaScript part of the website, and the Server part as well. Hence
having one single language on the two sides : client and server.
True but why would I need that? Why would I give up the ubiquity of
technologies like
give it time guys. they will come soon enough.
Troy Rollins wrote:
On Feb 24, 2006, at 11:20 AM, eric dolecki wrote:
Ah ok... but I'd still like to see some demos of anything built using
haXe...
Same here.
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
Another reason might be speed. The virtual machine is 20 to 40 times
faster than PHP interpreter or Flash Classic VM. That helps you serve a
The effects of a server VM being faster than the old version of a client VM
(Flash classic) is a Hard Thing to Assess :)
But, of course, sounds great
Another reason might be speed. The virtual machine is 20 to 40 times
faster than PHP interpreter or Flash Classic VM. That helps you serve a
The effects of a server VM being faster than the old version of a client
VM (Flash classic) is a Hard Thing to Assess :)
The VM can also run
But with the Flex compiler and framework coming for free, and haXe not
being 100% compatible with AS3 (as before mtasc wasn't 100% compat too
but the situation was different), I've yet to see a benefit to using it.
haXe is not only Flash. You can use the same language to develop the
There's been progress in this domain as well. You should expect haXe
to be able to get AS3 speed and new APIs quite soon. Plus, you will
still be able to use haXe to target Flash 6-7-8 player which is not
the case for AS3.
Of course it's the case with AS3. It's perfectly possible to write AS3
i think you miss the distinction between a language and its libraries.
From my understanding the core language will provide most features that
are available from each of the supported targets, but if you want to make
use of specific parts of the target platform then you will need to use its
It looks they've gotten a bit scrambled with the introduction of AS3 (could
be wrong).
But with the Flex compiler and framework coming for free, and haXe not being
100% compatible with AS3 (as before mtasc wasn't 100% compat too but the
situation was different), I've yet to see a benefit to
It looks they've gotten a bit scrambled with the introduction of AS3
(could be wrong).
You are ;)
haXe have been planned after AS3 was announced.
But with the Flex compiler and framework coming for free, and haXe not
being 100% compatible with AS3 (as before mtasc wasn't 100% compat too
but
Are there any demos of anything online to check for speed, etc? I haven't
found anything. Speed at lower plugins sounds pretty intriguing.
On 2/24/06, Nicolas Cannasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks they've gotten a bit scrambled with the introduction of AS3
(could be wrong).
You are ;)
I think 'speed' here is compile speed - not player speed?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of eric dolecki
Sent: 24 February 2006 15:56
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] haXe Flash
Are there any demos
If a little part that you written is true, you're my hero!
2006/2/24, Nicolas Cannasse [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It looks they've gotten a bit scrambled with the introduction of AS3
(could be wrong).
You are ;)
haXe have been planned after AS3 was announced.
But with the Flex compiler and
12 matches
Mail list logo
