]
To: Flash Coders List flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] nested for loops stumper
so then would it be this._parent[mc_+i] ?
enlighten please.
On Jan 25, 2008 9:08 AM, Muzak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should never have to do
, 2008 3:53 PM
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] nested for loops stumper
yep, you need some kind of scope declaration to tell you where the
items are. a lot of people use thisRoot = this; (or something that
states the location) and then all you have to do is pass 'thisRoot'
around as a reference
yep, you need some kind of scope declaration to tell you where the
items are. a lot of people use thisRoot = this; (or something that
states the location) and then all you have to do is pass 'thisRoot'
around as a reference to where that item is. That way you never
have to say 'this'
-
From: Rob Emenecker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Flash Coders List' flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 3:53 PM
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] nested for loops stumper
yep, you need some kind of scope declaration to tell you where the
items are. a lot of people use
ok guys sorry for sending this quest out
i found the answer .. u can not forget the this before any dynamically access
variables..
nothing wrong with a good reminder right : )
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:52:58 +
Subject:
yep, you need some kind of scope declaration to tell you where the items
are. a lot of people use thisRoot = this; (or something that states the
location) and then all you have to do is pass 'thisRoot' around as a
reference to where that item is. That way you never have to say 'this' when
it's not
6 matches
Mail list logo
