Sander wrote:
Think further. For years the Flash plugin on Mac has been a joke,
partly due to the fact the market is too small to optimize the code
further for a small platform.
For what it's worth, each of the prior few Player versions has had
specific extra investment in optimization for
I know that JD, Tinic has had many details on his blog as well. It's
just that, when I compare heavy multimedia tasks on mac and PC, the
difference has never been as big as it has in comparing Flash releases.
Sorry for the Off Topic folks.
For what it's worth, each of the prior few Player
MM is working on the Mac Intel Flash Plugin.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313347
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
marked as resolved - woohoo :)
On 1/11/06, Sander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MM is working on the Mac Intel Flash Plugin.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313347
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Think further. For years the Flash plugin on Mac has been a joke,
partly due to the fact the market is too small to optimize the code
further for a small platform.
That kinda changes when the Flash plugin runs on OSX86.
___
Flashcoders mailing list
With Rosetta it would run 80-85% as fast as normal... but those machines are
2-4x faster now... so even in emulation would run snappy as doody :)
edolecki
On 1/10/06, dls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know older versions of the Flash Player ran faster on Windows machines.
I'm hoping for some of
well, lets see some head to head real-world benchmarls first ;-)
On 10/1/06 21:10, eric dolecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With Rosetta it would run 80-85% as fast as normal... but those machines are
2-4x faster now... so even in emulation would run snappy as doody :)
edolecki
On
With Rosetta it would run 80-85% as fast as normal... but those machines
are
2-4x faster now... so even in emulation would run snappy as doody :)
Exactly how snappy *is* doody?
Danny
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
*real* snappy :)
On 1/10/06, Danny Kodicek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With Rosetta it would run 80-85% as fast as normal... but those machines
are
2-4x faster now... so even in emulation would run snappy as doody :)
Exactly how snappy *is* doody?
Danny
Christensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT [Flashcoders] Flash 8 and Rosetta -- MacIntel
To: Flashcoders mailing list flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
well, lets see some head to head real-world benchmarls first
it comes in, I'll see if I can run Flash and do some tests.
- John
Message: 15
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:14:01 +0100
From: S ? ren Christensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT [Flashcoders] Flash 8 and Rosetta -- MacIntel
To: Flashcoders mailing list flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
11 matches
Mail list logo
