RE: [Flashcoders] Oh the irony

2010-05-16 Thread Mattheis, Erik (MIN - WSW)
I'll say this again: I see no financial benefit to Adobe for keeping the Flash 
Player the standard for a rich Internet. If HTL5 + JS can do everything - or 
part of everything - the Flash Player can do. There's no harm done to Adobe by 
adding a Export as HTML5 option. We've even seen it demonstrated with the 
Smart Paste videos. 

Illustrator chart connected to live data: 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhjLlPegA8I
The above + Flash created animation: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v69S22ZBBqA

Adobe makes money by selling the authoring tools, not the Player.

From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com 
[flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Ktu 
[ktu_fl...@cataclysmicrewind.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 2:02 PM
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Oh the irony

From all of this crazy stuff going on the last couple of months, I can't
wait to see what happens.

apple blatantly bashed Flash.
They still offer Flash in their own store (because Adobe products have
helped keep apple alive).
Their policy changes.
the new iad network.
the iBad

TLF
Flash on Android and other smartphones
Google's support
CS5

Shit is changing, and all I can say is; lets do our part to make it change
the way we want it to change.

I've never been a huge fan of apple (and their keyboard shortcuts just don't
make sense). The more of this type of information to fuel the conflict will
only cause more change. Keep finding the good stuff.

Ktu
(sorry for my troll comment earlier)



On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Matt S. mattsp...@gmail.com wrote:

 that being said, I just looked at it from a different computer and it
 was using video so I'll just go ahead and put the mud on my own face
 ;) . Apparently on the previous computer it rolled back to Quicktime
 for some reason.

 .m

 On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Matt S. mattsp...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Kerry Thompson al...@cyberiantiger.biz
 wrote:
  I don't see anything ironic about using QuickTime. It's one of Apple's
  big success stories.
 
  I can kind of see them pushing HTML5 over Flash, for business reasons.
  But why would they want to use HTML5 over their own product?
 
  Of course you're right, *IF* you acknowledge that Steve Jobs' recent
  decisions have primarily been based on cold hard business
  calculations, which most of us do. But that's not the argument *he*,
  or other anti-Flashers are making. You hear all the time that the
  problem with Flash is that, as a plug-in, it exists outside the stack,
  in its own isolated box, whereas HTML5 is standards compliant and
  completely open and exists as part of the natural code flow. That is
  certainly true to a large extent, but the exact same thing can be said
  of Quicktime.
 
  Secondly, Jobs has made a very specific distinction between the iPhone
  vs the browser. While acknowledging that the iPhone is obviously a
  closed garden, he has said that when it comes to the *browser*, Apple
  is all about open, non-proprietary, standards compliant, HTML5, etc
  etc. And clearly, Quicktime is just as closed and proprietary as
  Flash, if not more so.
 
  Thirdly, I dont need to tell anyone here just how central the video
  tag has been in the whole debate. How often do you hear people saying
  that with the video tag, Flash is dead, completely ignoring
  everything else Flash does? If ever there was a proof of concept where
  Jobs  Co. should be putting their money where their mouth is, video
  is it. Especially since this video isnt DRM or in need of any other of
  the more advanced features that HTML5 can't handle yet.
 
  .m
 
 ___
 Flashcoders mailing list
 Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
 http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] Oh the irony

2010-05-16 Thread Matt S.
Absolutely. Where HTML5 can replace Flash, it should. I have no
problem with that. I actually think HTML5 is pretty cool. I just dont
think it needs to be an either/or question, and find the
struggle-to-the-death approach that Jobs is championing ludicrous, and
find alot of the Flash is dead because... statements to be based on
false assumptions. Yeah, of course, if you ban it from devices, it
will die, but that isnt exactly allowing the technology to evolve
organically. Bad technology dies under its own weight. No one needed
to drown Netscape or Director or Cobol in the bathtub in order to get
rid of them. If Flash's day is done, it will die soon enough on its
own. All Jobs has done is convince a whole swath of decision-makers
that Flash is toxic and shouldnt be touched, even in cases where Flash
is actually the superior option, and thats just a shame. How many game
developers are now being asked We want to do something like
http://www.gettheglass.com/but NOT in Flash, because Flash is
dead. You can do that in HTML5 right? And it needs to run perfectly on
the iPad.

.m

On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Mattheis, Erik (MIN - WSW)
ematth...@webershandwick.com wrote:
 I'll say this again: I see no financial benefit to Adobe for keeping the 
 Flash Player the standard for a rich Internet. If HTL5 + JS can do everything 
 - or part of everything - the Flash Player can do. There's no harm done to 
 Adobe by adding a Export as HTML5 option. We've even seen it demonstrated 
 with the Smart Paste videos.


___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


RE: [Flashcoders] Oh the irony

2010-05-16 Thread Mattheis, Erik (MIN - WSW)
Sort of makes one wonder if Apple knows Adobe isn't tied to a specific platform 
whereas Apple by definition is.

Very insightful - a specific technology makes that technology dwindle, it's an 
unstoppable force. Adobe is more loose footed  than Apple in the current 
bruhaha - creating the 10.1 player to work well across a variety of devices vs 
a locked down business model. Consumers and Adube won't give a f**k  whether 
the creative output from their products is through HTML5, the Flash Player or 
some other technology.

That said, if WebKit works identically across platforms, Adobe has nothing to 
lose by adapting the products to target it. The only way I can see this making 
sense for Apple is if they're aiming to eclipse Adobe with an authoring tool. 
And if it exports to Android, RIM, etc, well I'll adopt to it. But it seems to 
me Adobe is ahead in that game.

(Sent from my Mac Mini, haha)

From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com 
[flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Matt S. 
[mattsp...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2010 6:29 PM
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Oh the irony

Absolutely. Where HTML5 can replace Flash, it should. I have no
problem with that. I actually think HTML5 is pretty cool. I just dont
think it needs to be an either/or question, and find the
struggle-to-the-death approach that Jobs is championing ludicrous, and
find alot of the Flash is dead because... statements to be based on
false assumptions. Yeah, of course, if you ban it from devices, it
will die, but that isnt exactly allowing the technology to evolve
organically. Bad technology dies under its own weight. No one needed
to drown Netscape or Director or Cobol in the bathtub in order to get
rid of them. If Flash's day is done, it will die soon enough on its
own. All Jobs has done is convince a whole swath of decision-makers
that Flash is toxic and shouldnt be touched, even in cases where Flash
is actually the superior option, and thats just a shame. How many game
developers are now being asked We want to do something like
http://www.gettheglass.com/but NOT in Flash, because Flash is
dead. You can do that in HTML5 right? And it needs to run perfectly on
the iPad.

.m

On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Mattheis, Erik (MIN - WSW)
ematth...@webershandwick.com wrote:
 I'll say this again: I see no financial benefit to Adobe for keeping the 
 Flash Player the standard for a rich Internet. If HTL5 + JS can do everything 
 - or part of everything - the Flash Player can do. There's no harm done to 
 Adobe by adding a Export as HTML5 option. We've even seen it demonstrated 
 with the Smart Paste videos.


___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders