While converting AS2 to AS3 I struck with some issues
with converting prototype into classes:
AS2 code
1)
_global.Treemap = function(leaf) {
this.leaf = leaf;
};
2)
Treemap.prototype.appleTree = function(abc) {
for (var i = 1; iabc; i++) {
abc++;
}
Ok, thanks. Yes that makes sense. I was thinking that it might be a
slight enhancement to speed up execution time of a function.
Jiri
On 05-08-10 19:20, Juan Pablo Califano wrote:
The difference is that the reference is constant, meaning you cannot change
it.
You can't do this:
const
ktt wrote:
Which method is recommended by good practice?
The one that allows typesafety and proper checking of identifier names.
That is, not the prototype system.
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
I am trying:
buildXML = peopleXML.person.(@group == dd_group.value.toString())
peopleXML.person.(@room == dd_room.value.toString());
but it only seem to pick up the last condition - how can I get multiple
conditions in?
From:
Lehr, Theodore wrote:
I am trying:
buildXML = peopleXML.person.(@group == dd_group.value.toString())
peopleXML.person.(@room == dd_room.value.toString());
I am surprised that it even returns an XMLList, wait, does it?
___
Flashcoders mailing list
it does - based on the last condition How can I query the xml using
multiple conditions?
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Henrik Andersson
[he...@henke37.cjb.net]
Sent: Friday,
Hello everyone,
Firstly, thanks to all the helpful comments.
To follow up on the LMS:
(1) I have used Moodle only for checking several SCORM 1.2 versions of
our training programs. I wouldn't recommend it, particularly, if one want
to have their own reporting format. Additionally,
(2) Whether it is PHP or ColdFusion, if someone already has or can
recommend a sample code of Actionscript 3.0 only (w/o Flex) for synching the
local
database SQlite to the server and vs from the server back to the local
database, that would be appreciated and compensated.
This is
First of all:
Henrik, why rewrite core functionality? E4X is a standard, telling him to
write his own loop for data is something that I strongly disagree with.
The only case where I can see writing your own loops for XML would be
beneficial would be if you really had a performance issue and
Hi,
I guess you might have solved this for now - for future reference, I
have found the following 2 sources invaluable links when doing e4x stuff...
http://www.linkwerk.com/pub/javascript/e4x/e4x-tester/
(It's JavaScript / HTML, but it is a better / fuller implementation
than the
10 matches
Mail list logo
