http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplatform/whitepapers/roadmap.html
A new version of AS3 will be nice, it's just too bad no one wants Flash
anymore. Flash player is basically dead in the water, with its future usage
being hardcore gaming. How many of you guys/gals are doing that?
--
James
When HTML5 can do what I can do in AS3, I'll consider it. :)
John
John R. Sweeney Jr.
Senior Interactive Multimedia Developer
OnDemand Interactive Inc
Hoffman Estates, IL 60169
On Feb 22, 2012, at 12:50 PM, James Merrill wrote:
Jason Merrill wrote:
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplatform/whitepapers/roadmap.html
A new version of AS3 will be nice, it's just too bad no one wants Flash
anymore. Flash player is basically dead in the water, with its future usage
being hardcore gaming. How many of you guys/gals are
Jason Merrill wrote:
A new version of AS3 will be nice,
Jason Merrill did NOT write that, that was JAMES Merrill... easy mistake :)
just wanted to clarify...
Jason Merrill
Instructional Technology Architect II
Bank of America Global Learning
___
-Original
At last, Adobe showed us that is alive.
Il 22/02/2012 20:01, John R. Sweeney Jr. ha scritto:
When HTML5 can do what I can do in AS3, I'll consider it. :)
John
John R. Sweeney Jr.
Senior Interactive Multimedia Developer
OnDemand Interactive Inc
Hoffman Estates, IL 60169
On Feb 22, 2012,
Jason Merrill wrote:
Jason Merrill did NOT write that, that was JAMES Merrill... easy mistake :)
just wanted to clarify...
So he did. Sorry about that.
Cordially,
Kerry Thompson
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
When HTML5 can do what I can do in AS3, I'll consider it. :)
What exactly are you referring to? I have very few examples of things that
Flash can do that HTML5/CSS3/JS cant do these days. At my agency Flash is
being utilized for banner ads, and that's it. Every cool, animated website
we do
Haha, no worries - when I first glanced at his post, I first thought, Did I
write that?
Jason Merrill
Instructional Technology Architect II
Bank of America Global Learning
___
-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
James Merrill wrote:
Wouldn't it be such a nice world if JS was revised with ECMAScript 4? It's
unfortunate that it will never happen.
There was an ECMAScript 4 committee, but they disbanded 3-4 years ago.
Cordially,
Kerry Thompson
___
Flashcoders
Well as an example, I'm building 50 touchscreen applications that I then can
port over to iPad and Xoom with minimal changes. eLearning apps, software
simulation and much more. But then again, I don't build websites for the most
part, I build full blown applications. I have a strong need for
Except that you need a certain level of browser to handle HTML5. That's
the bummer, it'll
Take some time to get more people on board.
-Gerry
On 2/22/12 2:24 PM, James Merrill jmerri...@gmail.com wrote:
When HTML5 can do what I can do in AS3, I'll consider it. :)
What exactly are you
Especially corporate America where they bulk still use IE 6 and their machines
are locked down. THANKS IT! :)
John R. Sweeney Jr.
Senior Interactive Multimedia Developer
OnDemand Interactive Inc
Hoffman Estates, IL 60169
On Feb 22, 2012, at 1:41 PM, Creighton, Gerry wrote:
Except
I'm going to play devils advocate here for a second.
The whole browser compatibility aspect of HTML is diminishing, modern
browsers are constantly updated without having to re-download them. In a
couple of years, it won't be a problem.
Another major concern of mine was seeing this site:
Have you tried building an interactive 3D environment in Javascript/HTML5?
There is 3D capability out there, but most of the examples I have seen have
been ports from C++ code. Just because there is a trend towards something, and
it's possible to do something with a new tech, doesn't make it
Fwiw, that site is actually a Flash/HTML5 hybrid, mostly HTML5, with Flash
apparently handling the weak spots, eg video, audio etc. But yeah, even
just judging the HTML-only elements that's a beautiful site.
.m
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:52 PM, James Merrill jmerri...@gmail.com wrote:
Another
James Merrill skriver:
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplatform/whitepapers/roadmap.html
A new version of AS3 will be nice, it's just too bad no one wants Flash
anymore. Flash player is basically dead in the water, with its future usage
being hardcore gaming. How many of you guys/gals are
Henrik Andersson skriver:
James Merrill skriver:
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplatform/whitepapers/roadmap.html
A new version of AS3 will be nice, it's just too bad no one wants Flash
anymore. Flash player is basically dead in the water, with its future usage
being hardcore gaming. How
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Henrik Andersson he...@henke37.cjb.netwrote:
If you ask me, Adobe needs to get the animation part back on track
before the competition runs past them.
Everything Adobe is doing suggests that they think that particular horse
has already kicked the gate down and
We are building a full screen game with a novel interface and we need the
power of Flash.
My primary concern is not seeing any mention of Alchemy's successor on the
Roadmap as we are hanging out for it's features.
On 23 February 2012 05:50, James Merrill jmerri...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't personally tried WebGL. I have seen tests though that show it's
faster than Flash. However, there aren't any major frameworks like we have
for Flash Stage3D. I am sure that will change in time though. I don't know
if it's a safe bet that Flash will win out over HTML5 with 3D.
In regards
Matt S. skriver:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Henrik Andersson
he...@henke37.cjb.netwrote:
If you ask me, Adobe needs to get the animation part back on track
before the competition runs past them.
Everything Adobe is doing suggests that they think that particular horse
has already
Because they didn't start it. They just bought it.
Flash is not personal to them, it's just a number, that is loosing.
IMO
Business is business, personal is personal.
If it don't make dollars then it don't make sense!! Right!?!
If I had anything to say about the future of flash, it would be,
Karl DeSaulniers skriver:
If I had anything to say about the future of flash, it would be, sell it
back to Macromedia if you can't fill the position.
Adobe didn't buy Flash. They bought Macromedia.
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Ok, then sell it/give it back to the guys who started Macromedia.
Thanks for the clarification though.
Best,
Karl
On Feb 22, 2012, at 6:29 PM, Henrik Andersson wrote:
Karl DeSaulniers skriver:
If I had anything to say about the future of flash, it would be,
sell it
back to Macromedia if
Karl DeSaulniers skriver:
Ok, then sell it/give it back to the guys who started Macromedia.
It seems like they already have positions in the top Adobe management.
http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/executivebios/davidwadhwani.html
I will be out of the office starting 02/22/2012 and will not return until
02/27/2012.
Please contact andrew.luck...@aero.bombardier.com (514) 344-6621 x4-6606
for any pressing issues.
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Oh! Then were doomed...
My basic point is those guys had a great idea and it shouldn't die
like this.
If flash could rise up like it did back then, I believe it could rise
again.
But maybe it is time, since what it rose above is now catching up.
Not there yet, but close second at least. (Or
27 matches
Mail list logo
