Zárate wrote:
a company with a large reputation
Yeah, I'd even say a *huge* reputation but what reputation? Do we
start talking about wmode? Shared fonts? Problems with
Stage.with/Stage.height? MovieclipLoader? Components?
We all understand these issues, but they are still irrelevant.
Chris Allen wrote:
If you are selling directly to clients as a
freelancer or agency, it's the same thing, if they respect you, then
your opinion on the technology that they should choose will matter.
Not the same thing at all. Respect is something you have to earn over
time with a new
And anyhow, this is still beyond the original point - which was that
SWHX will almost certainly move away from compatibility with
AS3/ActionScript and closer to HaXe/Screenweaver unity ;)
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your
I do understand that. Currently this is not a problem, but as AS3/FP9 move
forward on their own inevitable path, will SWHX play catchup or will it
concentrate on its own thing? I suspect the latter.
On 9/2/06, Thomas Wester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please note SWHX has full support for AS3
So HX is the successor to v4? Shame for me, since I'll be saying bye bye to
Screenweaver and waiting for Apollo, but good luck in your ventures - I
think there's a lot of value in it.
On 8/31/06, Edwin van Rijkom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
We are happy to announce that Screenweaver HX
haXe at all.
-David R
On 8/31/06, Cliff Rowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So HX is the successor to v4? Shame for me, since I'll be saying bye
bye to
Screenweaver and waiting for Apollo, but good luck in your ventures - I
think there's a lot of value in it.
On 8/31/06, Edwin van Rijkom [EMAIL
Nicolas Cannasse wrote:
Several important differences between Screenweaver HX and Apollo :
- size : SWHX takes 450 KB. Apollo is expected to be in the 5-9 MB range
Sure, but Apollo is a global runtime isn't it?
- extensibility : SWHX is extensible with custom-made C libraries.
Apollo is not
I think, to be honest, that you're just a bit of an idealist. Which is
good, but we have to live and work in the real world where we don't
always get to make the decisions.
Nicolas Cannasse wrote:
If nothing goes wrong, guess which one is cheaper ? :)
Nicolas Cannasse wrote:
What do you exactly mean by a global runtime ? It's possible that once
installed, you might not have to install it again. But 5-9 MB is quite
big for the user the first time he want to download your application.
Evidently from your reply you know what I mean by a
hank williams wrote:
The reality is that the larger the company, the greater the liklihood
that they only want to buy from another large company. This is why the
whole market has moved from b2b to b2c. Consumers dont care about who
sold them stuff. Big companies generally care deeply. This means
Nicolas Cannasse wrote:
Well I think they must sometimes think it very LOUD when seeing all the
press coverage AJAX is getting ;)
I don't get your point..
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the
On 9/1/06, Edwin van Rijkom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, I can see that line of reasoning. One can debate over whether
developers or customers are wrong or right on finding using open source
software unattractive, and all its pro's and con's, but I think no one
has been able to answer that
On 9/1/06, Edwin van Rijkom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it will, but as I said, I think it will happen in it's own
right -
as the SW/HX combination - not as an extension to the existing
Flash/Flex
platform.
I agree that's the most likely scenario.
I'm glad my point is finally being
Also, try running the FP9 standalone player by hand. It seems that Windows
sees whatever player you last used as your default. I've noticed that if I
run the FP8 player and then run/debug in Flex, it'll launch FP8. If I run
FP9 first, it'll launch FP9.
HTH
On 7/30/06, the real punk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lol, it worked for about more than 30 minutes
now this is what i get http://www.punkscum.org/files/misc/060730_002.png
wouldn't it be dreamy if the eclipse ide launched a flash player
window instead of launching the browser; maybe this could be
5. Do the same for the 'Run' text box
Just to clarify, the 'Run' input box should point to 'someproject.swf', not
'someproject-debug'swf'
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
On 7/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey how do i not get all these message in other words not me registerd to
flas coders
The instructions appear at the end of every message you receive from the
mailing list.
___
17 matches
Mail list logo
