Fumio Nonaka wrote:
Using new Number is... silly. The Number-object is quite useless
and can't be used for anything, that a regular number can't. Use
normal numbers and use numbers:
The Number object can have a property, which a regular number can't.
I don't know if it is useful, though.
I
Sascha Balkau wrote:
Ok but it there a way to get the name of the variable that is reffering
to the object? First I thought eval() could be used for that but it
seems not.
There is no one variable holding the name of an object. If your idea
is something along a trace-function:
function
Hi,
i've had a look with flasm, it explicitly calls A.dothis() in A.doit.
writing this.dothis() isn't possible because it's a static function --
there is no object this could refer to.
there is, as far as i know, nothing you can do about it except to work
around it by either cutting'n'pasting
Jose Maria Barros wrote:
Hello! Im trying to do a portfolio gallery with a grid and small
thumbnails with xml.
I ve been doing some tutorials to help me..but this thing doesnt work.
[snip]
The xml file is made correctly and the path for the images is
link=imagens/somepic.jpg
The problem
Dan Thomas wrote:
Can I provide array like access to a custom collection object?
E.g.
Class MyClass
{
private var myArray:Array;
public function getArray():Array
{
return this.myArray;
}
}
[snip]
How can I change it so I can achieve
someClass.elem(0) = myObj;
Nope - of course not. elem is a function - you can't use it that way.
You can do anything you like, though. Create your own function for instance:
someClass.setElem(0, myObj);
Or a general addElem, that doesn't take a position argument but just
pushes to the end:
Mike Boutin wrote:
Doesnt XPath.selectNodes(myxml, pathtocontent/text()); return the text
value as well?
The documentation says, that selectNodes *always* returns an array of
XMLNode-objects - and it does. Always.
The text()-syntax is only used to get the XMLNode representing a text
node -
nik crosina wrote:
Has anybody worked with Flash and double byte (e.g. chinese) characters
sets?
Or is that a non issue in Flash. We are having to convert a Director
application into a fully unicoded Flash version (the missing unicdoe
implementation of Director being the main reason for this).
Jason Rayles wrote:
Is there a reason that a movie clip attached to _root cannot be removed
using removeMovieClip?
If _root.getNextHighestDepth() returns a negative value, then you cannot
remove the movieclip unless you swap it up to some positive depth. I'm
not sure, but that might be it.
Jason Rayles wrote:
Has this been discussed?
Flash player 8
trace(this._alpha);
this._alpha -= 10;
trace(this._alpha);
Output:
100
89.84375
Yup, alpha is stored internally as values dividable by 100/256. Thus the
value upon setting will be rounded to the nearest legal value. Use
another
Mike Boutin wrote:
Still wasnt able to get it working. I had to resort to using nodeValue
instead. pain in the ass
Why is it a workaround? Doesn't the XPath return the XMLNode? You can't
just use the regular toString-method of the XMLNode-object - that'll
return the wrong encoding. The
Mike Boutin wrote:
even in this case the result is undefined
string = XPath.selectNodes(my_xml, /pathto[1]/xml).nodeValue;
I've just gotten the libraries, and it is exactly as I expected.
selectNodes returns an Array of XMLNode-objects. Even the notion of
/text() is just to get the node,
Hi,
I believe, that I've found a bug in the Flash 8 compiler.
Just for the facts: I have Flash 8 Professional (English edition) for
Windows XP - no other version number, as far as I can see.
The bug is, that the compiler will result in a missing pop-operation
thus leaving an extra item on
Martin Klasson wrote:
Run this, once in flash player6-setting, and one time in 7/8, both
compiled with as2. The Strong-typing of the parameter doesn't affect the
result.
But how come this is so indifferent results, was perhaps the output of
flsahplayer6 wrong accordingly to ecma?
Andreas Rønning wrote:
[snip]
*Yawn* here we go again, another new guy trying to understand this
OBVIOUS concept that we've been through so many times already. I
can't believe he's bothering us with this again!
[snip]
Sorry, I was in a bad mood due to other circumstances, had just
15 matches
Mail list logo
