Re: [Flashcoders] fp9 ExternalInterface bug?

2006-05-17 Thread eric dolecki

Not sure whats happening - but it seems like callStack problems may be the
culprit - looks like perhaps using XMLSocket would be a more reliable way to
go which is unfortunate...


On 5/16/06, Geoff Stearns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


maybe it's not serializing a value properly?

there are a few known issues with it in fp8, mainly newline elements...

more info here:
http://codinginparadise.org/weblog/2006/02/how-to-speed-up-flash-8s.html


On May 16, 2006, at 6:21 PM, eric dolecki wrote:

 Its been called to my attention at work that sometimes my embedded
 SWF is
 making calls out to Python (using ExternalInterface) where the XML
 document
 only contains:

 NaN/invoke

 And thats it. Could this perhaps be a known bug in the player
 itself? The
 syntax itself isn't valid.
 ___
 Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
 To change your subscription options or search the archive:
 http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

 Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
 Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
 http://www.figleaf.com
 http://training.figleaf.com

___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


Re: [Flashcoders] fp9 ExternalInterface bug?

2006-05-17 Thread Mike Chambers

Remember that this is a beta, so there are going to be issues.

We have recently fixed a bunch of issues with eternal interface 
(including the ones mentioned by Geoff).


Do you have a simple reproduceable test case? If so, I can send it to 
the team.


mike chambers

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

eric dolecki wrote:

Not sure whats happening - but it seems like callStack problems may be the
culprit - looks like perhaps using XMLSocket would be a more reliable 
way to

go which is unfortunate...


On 5/16/06, Geoff Stearns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


maybe it's not serializing a value properly?

there are a few known issues with it in fp8, mainly newline elements...

more info here:
http://codinginparadise.org/weblog/2006/02/how-to-speed-up-flash-8s.html


On May 16, 2006, at 6:21 PM, eric dolecki wrote:

 Its been called to my attention at work that sometimes my embedded
 SWF is
 making calls out to Python (using ExternalInterface) where the XML
 document
 only contains:

 NaN/invoke

 And thats it. Could this perhaps be a known bug in the player
 itself? The
 syntax itself isn't valid.
 ___
 Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
 To change your subscription options or search the archive:
 http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

 Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
 Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
 http://www.figleaf.com
 http://training.figleaf.com

___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com

___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


Re: [Flashcoders] fp9 ExternalInterface bug?

2006-05-17 Thread Nicolas Cannasse

Remember that this is a beta, so there are going to be issues.

We have recently fixed a bunch of issues with eternal interface 
(including the ones mentioned by Geoff).


I've been also experiencing a lot of problems with Flash8 
ExternalInterface, like the need to quote \\n to n in order to 
get the string passed between Flash and JS without modifications.


How theses fixes will affect backward compatibility ?

Nicolas
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


Re: [Flashcoders] fp9 ExternalInterface bug?

2006-05-17 Thread eric dolecki

We are working on a whitepaper to give Adobe SWF engineers - hope to have
something when we get a little time to put it together. It might boil down
to multi-threaded Python and single-threaded Flash (for the most part)... in
addition to some other things.

On 5/17/06, Mike Chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Remember that this is a beta, so there are going to be issues.

We have recently fixed a bunch of issues with eternal interface
(including the ones mentioned by Geoff).

Do you have a simple reproduceable test case? If so, I can send it to
the team.

mike chambers

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

eric dolecki wrote:
 Not sure whats happening - but it seems like callStack problems may be
the
 culprit - looks like perhaps using XMLSocket would be a more reliable
 way to
 go which is unfortunate...


 On 5/16/06, Geoff Stearns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 maybe it's not serializing a value properly?

 there are a few known issues with it in fp8, mainly newline elements...

 more info here:

http://codinginparadise.org/weblog/2006/02/how-to-speed-up-flash-8s.html


 On May 16, 2006, at 6:21 PM, eric dolecki wrote:

  Its been called to my attention at work that sometimes my embedded
  SWF is
  making calls out to Python (using ExternalInterface) where the XML
  document
  only contains:
 
  NaN/invoke
 
  And thats it. Could this perhaps be a known bug in the player
  itself? The
  syntax itself isn't valid.
  ___
  Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
  To change your subscription options or search the archive:
  http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
 
  Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
  Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
  http://www.figleaf.com
  http://training.figleaf.com

 ___
 Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
 To change your subscription options or search the archive:
 http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

 Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
 Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
 http://www.figleaf.com
 http://training.figleaf.com

 ___
 Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
 To change your subscription options or search the archive:
 http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

 Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
 Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
 http://www.figleaf.com
 http://training.figleaf.com
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


[Flashcoders] fp9 ExternalInterface bug?

2006-05-16 Thread eric dolecki

Its been called to my attention at work that sometimes my embedded SWF is
making calls out to Python (using ExternalInterface) where the XML document
only contains:

NaN/invoke

And thats it. Could this perhaps be a known bug in the player itself? The
syntax itself isn't valid.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


Re: [Flashcoders] fp9 ExternalInterface bug?

2006-05-16 Thread Geoff Stearns

maybe it's not serializing a value properly?

there are a few known issues with it in fp8, mainly newline elements...

more info here:
http://codinginparadise.org/weblog/2006/02/how-to-speed-up-flash-8s.html


On May 16, 2006, at 6:21 PM, eric dolecki wrote:

Its been called to my attention at work that sometimes my embedded  
SWF is
making calls out to Python (using ExternalInterface) where the XML  
document

only contains:

NaN/invoke

And thats it. Could this perhaps be a known bug in the player  
itself? The

syntax itself isn't valid.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com