[Flashcoders] FATAL Zinc issue

2006-03-27 Thread peterblaze
Hello Gene and everyone, We identified an issue which caused this behavior on certain XP and 2000 systems. Minor changes have now been implemented to prevent the possibility of this issue arising again. The latest 2.5.0.12 build includes these minor changes and will prevent this issue from

Re: [Flashcoders] FATAL Zinc issue

2006-03-27 Thread Derek Vadneau
] To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 6:38 AM Subject: SPAM-LOW: [Flashcoders] FATAL Zinc issue Hello Gene and everyone, We identified an issue which caused this behavior on certain XP and 2000 systems. Minor changes have now been implemented to prevent

RE: [Flashcoders] FATAL Zinc issue

2006-03-27 Thread Lee McColl-Sylvester
They do up the build... Now it's 2.5.0.12 whereas before it was 2.5.0.11 Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derek Vadneau Sent: 27 March 2006 17:09 To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] FATAL Zinc issue Hey

RE: [Flashcoders] FATAL Zinc issue

2006-03-27 Thread Derek Vadneau
@chattyfig.figleaf.com Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 11:22 AM Subject: SPAM-LOW: RE: [Flashcoders] FATAL Zinc issue They do up the build... Now it's 2.5.0.12 whereas before it was 2.5.0.11 Lee ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your

RE: [Flashcoders] FATAL Zinc issue

2006-03-27 Thread Lee McColl-Sylvester
Oh, ok Erm, my bad. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derek Vadneau Sent: 27 March 2006 17:24 To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] FATAL Zinc issue Actually they don't always: http://www.mdmforum.com/forum

RE: [Flashcoders] FATAL Zinc issue

2006-03-27 Thread John Hattan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derek Vadneau Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 10:24 AM To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] FATAL Zinc issue Actually they don't always: http://www.mdmforum.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=14984hl

Re: [Flashcoders] FATAL Zinc issue

2006-03-27 Thread Ian Thomas
On 3/27/06, John Hattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Speaking as a registered user, Zinc is currently suffering from some serious quality problems. Version 2.5 was rushed out the door, and they haven't done a good job staying on top of things since then. Yes - I've had exactly the same problem.

Re: [Flashcoders] FATAL Zinc issue

2006-03-22 Thread coroner
cool :) nice bug :) ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and

Re: [Flashcoders] FATAL Zinc issue

2006-03-22 Thread Troy Rollins
On Mar 21, 2006, at 9:10 PM, Gene Jannece wrote: I work for a company that is greatly effected by the New Zinc issue that popped up. I was wondering if anybody had found a quick fix or if it's really totally fatal. The Zinc guys never fail to find clever new functionalities. I know I've

[Flashcoders] FATAL Zinc issue

2006-03-21 Thread Gene Jannece
I work for a company that is greatly effected by the New Zinc issue that popped up. I was wondering if anybody had found a quick fix or if it's really totally fatal. basicly if you make a user in windows with a # (pound sign) in the username and run a zinc made .exe, you run the risk of