Perhaps windows hardware is a better term. You probably knew what i
meant.
My response was to someone claiming it was a good way to put 3d on the
web. If i had a GENERAL dislike of whatever the hell let you put 3d on a
screen i'd have bigger problems than sparkle. Hell i do C# at work, and
My entire point is cluttering the web is bad, can't believe you didn't
see that. Or perhaps you just havent read the entire thread i dunno :)
Sure, but for every new technology, 10 people will use it well, and 1000
will use it to clutter the web. Remember the blink tag? It's just the nature
For all the 3d naysayers, perhaps you were the same guys that said a
few years back that there was no place for video on the internet, no
place for applications on the internet. Perhaps there's no place for
telephony on the internet and I'm just imagining skype and the coming
wave of
Agreed, well put.
Mike
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Calv J schrieb:
Sorry if someone already sent this in (I'm in digest
mode and haven't seen it mentioned yet) - but you can
download sparkle preview release:
does this help me with my bad coding skills ?
micha
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Hehe no ;-)
Its pretty buggy too, so Id wait for a more stable build before
evaluating...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael
Stuhr
Sent: 25 January 2006 09:02
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Microsoft
Nick Weekes schrieb:
Hehe no ;-)
Its pretty buggy too, so Id wait for a more stable build before
evaluating...
so why does someone post it to this list ?
micha
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
so why does someone post it to this list ?
Since it's going to be a direct competitor/alternative to Flash, and since
it's pushed by Microsoft. Wether you like it or not you'll need to keep your
eyes on what happening over there.
Personally I think it's great to finally see a promising new
I couldn't give less of a crap about putting 3d on the web, and i'm
pretty sure the average consumer agrees with me. Content rules.
I seem to recall Shockwave 3d not ever really taking off, and if 3d is
the only thing sparkle has over Flash it ain't gonna do much good as a
competitor.
-
3D on the web is a niche market at best. So are all '3d desktop' metaphors.
It doesn't simplify the user experience one bit, quite to the contrary. As
long as computer screens are flat surfaces, 3D desktop interfaces and 3d
websites will never have the ease of use, flexibility and editability of a
of features beside this 3d-part. Intresting times ahead!
/David
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Andreas Rønning
Skickat: den 25 januari 2006 10:58
Till: Flashcoders mailing list
Ämne: Re: SV: [Flashcoders] Microsoft Sparkle
I couldn't give less
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Skoglund
Sent: 25 January 2006 10:26
To: 'Flashcoders mailing list'
Subject: SV: SV: [Flashcoders] Microsoft Sparkle
OK, you maybe YOU don't care much for it, but a RIA-platform needs to be
flexible as possible and give the developers as much freedom as possible.
Content
To: 'Flashcoders mailing list'
Subject: SV: SV: [Flashcoders] Microsoft Sparkle
OK, you maybe YOU don't care much for it, but a RIA-platform needs to be
flexible as possible and give the developers as much freedom as possible.
Content rules, but why restrict content to 2d? I'm not talking about wacky
3d
Rønning
Sent: 25 January 2006 11:46
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: SV: [Flashcoders] Microsoft Sparkle
Sparkle doesn't supply decent 3d. xaml 3d is little more than vrml 2006.
It's not even a step in the right direction, it's just an excuse to use
directx online, and frankly, putting
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: SV: [Flashcoders] Microsoft Sparkle
Sparkle doesn't supply decent 3d. xaml 3d is little more than vrml 2006.
It's not even a step in the right direction, it's just an excuse to use
directx online, and frankly, putting directx online is a shit idea that
dilutes
Hi friends,
I agree with Adrian, polar extremes never solve anything, they cause people
to take sides and bicker endlessly. I can see it happening already. An
opinion free approach would be most intelligent, there is no telling what
you will run into if you give your presuppositions a rest. The
I'd have to agree with elibol. And, just as a reminder, here are some
famously wrong expert predictions about what would or wouldn't happen
in our industry:Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons.
-- Popular Mechanics, forecasting the relentless march of science, 1949
I think
Hi Andreas,
To clarify, my statement was not directed at you only, but I can say that it
certainly did include you.
On the topic of opinion, I agree that an opinion free approach is dangerous
to the ignorant, but only dangerous in this situation if we're to say that
we're all ignorant as
i've read specs, watched demonstrations, i've TRIED to be excited, but all
i can tell is that it's another proprietary tech trying to cash in on a
growing market.
Which specs did you read and which demos did you watch? Certainly not
the same ones I've read and watched. First of all Sparkle
Oh, and your rant about forcing people to use PC hardware, WTF? What
platform *doesn't* use PC hardware these days?
you mean intel chips? or the usual pc architecture?
things like phones and other mobile devices, non microsoft gaming
platforms for example.
anyway, its a sparkle thread
you mean intel chips? or the usual pc architecture?
things like phones and other mobile devices, non microsoft gaming
platforms for example.
I don't know, he said it, I was just responding to it. The quote was:
As long as they use their tools, and make their customers conform to PC
21 matches
Mail list logo
