The two sites you mention are public sites; if they drive 10% of their
potential audience away, but receive 20% more benefit (e.g. retaining
the most loyal viewers, lowing bandwidth costs with newer codec, etc...)
by doing so then it makes sense. For intra-net type or b2b type sites
the
Steven Sacks | BLITZ wrote:
You can still make banner ads and cartoons with Flash 4.
That's what Flash is used for right?
So I've read ;-)
(For the main thread, people usually decide what features their
application might need, and then balance that against the trends in
capability
(For the main thread, people usually decide what features their
application might need, and then balance that against the trends in
capability among their own audience.)
MySpace requires Flash 9 Player, You Tube requires Flash 8 (last I
checked). They seem to have no problems getting people
To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Subject: [Flashcoders] Q:Justifying Flash 8 Content
I'm working on a large commercial site that uses FP7 based content.
What are some of the arguments and/or approaches that Flash developers
have
and are using to push the transition to FP8 content?
The bottom line
What about accessability/use-ability/SEO-friendly aspects?
We just released skins for Flash 8 that support captioning and that are
accessible to disabled users. I've got them on our accessibility blog
for now, but will move them to the Flash exchange soon.
http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
PM
To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Subject: [Flashcoders] Q:Justifying Flash 8 Content
I'm working on a large commercial site that uses FP7 based content.
What are some of the arguments and/or approaches that Flash developers have and
are using to push the transition to FP8 content
You can still make banner ads and cartoons with Flash 4.
That's what Flash is used for right?
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
You can still make banner ads and cartoons with Flash 4.
That's what Flash is used for right?
WINK! ;) *SARCASM* J/K
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
I'm working on a large commercial site that uses FP7 based content.
What are some of the arguments and/or approaches that Flash developers have and
are using to push the transition to FP8 content?
The bottom line is really about providing the best user experience possible
Jim bachalo
I just use:
object, embed {
align: justify;
}
and that usually does the trick!*
* it's a joke. ha ha.
On Oct 31, 2006, at 3:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on a large commercial site that uses FP7 based content.
What are some of the arguments and/or
] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 3:44 PM
To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Subject: [Flashcoders] Q:Justifying Flash 8 Content
I'm working on a large commercial site that uses FP7 based content.
What are some of the arguments and/or approaches that Flash
Merrill, Jason wrote:
Video capabilities can be a big seller - also the fact most people have
it now is another. The much enhanced security of the 8 player could be
your Ace of Spades though. Might be hard to convince them that the
blur, dropshadow, glow etc. effects you can do dynamically
not sure about accessibility changes.. but SEO changes are kinda
pointless in most cases.. i wrote an article on flash SEO a while
back that might interest you (and others on the list):
http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/03/13/modern-approach-flash-seo/
On Oct 31, 2006, at 4:56 PM, Micky
We've just sold two projects on FP8, the first because of it bitmap
rendering capabilities, and the fact that we could use bitmap fills to
stretch bitmap textures on 3D surfaces.
Recently we've been using cacheAsBitmap, and also custom bitmap
caching methods to massively increase the speed of
14 matches
Mail list logo
