[Flashcoders] Re: anyone using mCom ?

2006-06-07 Thread Sorensen, Shannon M - MWL

Quite frankly the vendor has destroyed any value the product may have.

http://67.104.17.194/complaint/view/57077332/c/47x9hr


___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


Re: [Flashcoders] Re: anyone using mCom ?

2006-06-07 Thread Rich Rodecker

alrighty then, good thing i asked.  the only reason i was considering
them was because of their smaller footprint, since I feel like there's
just too much bloat to ue the v2 comps on a regular web site (as
opposed to an application).

there's always the bit components, i guess.


On 6/7/06, Sorensen, Shannon M - MWL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Quite frankly the vendor has destroyed any value the product may have.

http://67.104.17.194/complaint/view/57077332/c/47x9hr


___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com