[Flashcoders] anyone using mCom?

2006-06-07 Thread Rich Rodecker

anyone out there have any experience with using the mCom component set
from Metalliq?  Just looking for some feedback...performance issues,
comparison with v2, wierdness, extending, etc.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


RE: [Flashcoders] anyone using mCom?

2006-06-07 Thread Steve Polk
The components themselves are great. They are lightweight, generally easy to
skin, and the API is very compatible with the v2 components that MM ships.

With that said; the company that acquired the set, Metaliq, does not appear
to be interested in documenting or supporting them. I have sent numerous
emails/tickets trying to get better documentation, but have not received a
reply yet on that issue. At one point, Grant Skinner said his people would
try to get them to update the documentation, but this has not happened yet.

Direct from their website you can see the last update was: September 1st,
2005 Version 1.0.124.

HTH,
Steve

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich
Rodecker
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 12:02 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: [Flashcoders] anyone using mCom?

anyone out there have any experience with using the mCom component set
from Metalliq?  Just looking for some feedback...performance issues,
comparison with v2, wierdness, extending, etc.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com




___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


Re: [Flashcoders] anyone using mCom?

2006-06-07 Thread Rich Rodecker

yeah, theri sample app on the homepage has a note on the bottom that
says the app was built with eariler versions of the components, and
the set was being updated, but i didnt see anything on the site
regarding updates.



On 6/7/06, Steve Polk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The components themselves are great. They are lightweight, generally easy to
skin, and the API is very compatible with the v2 components that MM ships.

With that said; the company that acquired the set, Metaliq, does not appear
to be interested in documenting or supporting them. I have sent numerous
emails/tickets trying to get better documentation, but have not received a
reply yet on that issue. At one point, Grant Skinner said his people would
try to get them to update the documentation, but this has not happened yet.

Direct from their website you can see the last update was: September 1st,
2005 Version 1.0.124.

HTH,
Steve

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich
Rodecker
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 12:02 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: [Flashcoders] anyone using mCom?

anyone out there have any experience with using the mCom component set
from Metalliq?  Just looking for some feedback...performance issues,
comparison with v2, wierdness, extending, etc.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com




___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


[Flashcoders] anyone using mCom?

2006-06-07 Thread Steve Krichten
I've been disappointed with the MCOM components.  Alot of that has to do 
with the lack of documentation and support.  They match the V2 API's in 
many cases, but in the cases where they don't its not always easy to 
figure out how to make them work the way you want since the methods and 
properties are not properly documented.  In some cases the existing 
documentation has incorrect method and property names adding to the 
frustration.  Then when you try to contact their support you're very 
lucky to ever hear back from them.  They have a support ticket system 
(not linked anywhere on their site), but I can't find how to access the 
page to add a new ticket, I can only get to the list of my old list of 
tickets (thanks to some old emails I saved). Its not a good support 
situation to say the least.


There are some bugs in the components, which is understandable, but 
without proper support it becomes a pretty big problem when you run into 
them.   I expected much better than this especially considering the 
price tag.


If they improved support and actively updated them, only then could I 
recommend purchasing them.


On the positive side, I do like the skinning capabilities.  Its flexible 
and pretty straight forward once you get past the errors in the 
documentation (I seem to recall some of the linkage ID's are wrong).  In 
most respects the components themselves are a step up from the V2 
components, but only a subset of the V2 components are represented.


-Steve


*Rich Rodecker* wrote:


anyone out there have any experience with using the mCom component set
from Metalliq?  Just looking for some feedback...performance issues,
comparison with v2, wierdness, extending, etc.


___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


Re: [Flashcoders] anyone using mCom?

2006-06-07 Thread Ryan Matsikas

Sorry to double post, but I replyed to Steve's (different Steve) thread with
the same title. Check it out.

On 6/7/06, Rich Rodecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


yeah, theri sample app on the homepage has a note on the bottom that
says the app was built with eariler versions of the components, and
the set was being updated, but i didnt see anything on the site
regarding updates.



On 6/7/06, Steve Polk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The components themselves are great. They are lightweight, generally
easy to
 skin, and the API is very compatible with the v2 components that MM
ships.

 With that said; the company that acquired the set, Metaliq, does not
appear
 to be interested in documenting or supporting them. I have sent numerous
 emails/tickets trying to get better documentation, but have not received
a
 reply yet on that issue. At one point, Grant Skinner said his people
would
 try to get them to update the documentation, but this has not happened
yet.

 Direct from their website you can see the last update was: September
1st,
 2005 Version 1.0.124.

 HTH,
 Steve

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich
 Rodecker
 Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 12:02 PM
 To: Flashcoders mailing list
 Subject: [Flashcoders] anyone using mCom?

 anyone out there have any experience with using the mCom component set
 from Metalliq?  Just looking for some feedback...performance issues,
 comparison with v2, wierdness, extending, etc.
 ___
 Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
 To change your subscription options or search the archive:
 http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

 Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
 Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
 http://www.figleaf.com
 http://training.figleaf.com




 ___
 Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
 To change your subscription options or search the archive:
 http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

 Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
 Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
 http://www.figleaf.com
 http://training.figleaf.com

___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


Re: [Flashcoders] anyone using mCom?

2006-06-07 Thread Mike Britton

Could someone please email these .mxps to me so I can do a visual inspection?

;-)

Mike
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


Re: [Flashcoders] anyone using mCom?

2006-06-07 Thread Steve Krichten

Thanks for the info Ryan, that should prove useful in the future.

-Steve

--
*Ryan Matsikas* wrote :
Some people on this list use mCom and a few of the developers (including 
myself) are also on the list, if you aren't having luck with Metaliq's 
response's to your issues feel free to ask here. Also there is a google 
group for mCom that a few users are on, and some of the issues/bugs have 
been covered there. The google group is located at: 
http://groups.google.com/group/mCom-Flash-Component-Documentation 
Cheers, Ryan

___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com