Re: [Flashcoders] clearInterval(0);

2007-03-06 Thread Andy Herrman
I would suggest initializing the interval value as NULL instead of 0, since I think 0 is a valid ID. That way you can be sure you don't accidentally clear an interval that you don't want to. -Andy On 3/4/07, Alain Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well actually, clearInterval(0) clears the

Re: [Flashcoders] clearInterval(0);

2007-03-06 Thread Muzak
or: var num:Number = Number.NaN; trace(isNaN(num)); regards, Muzak - Original Message - From: Andy Herrman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 6:37 PM Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] clearInterval(0); I would suggest initializing

[Flashcoders] clearInterval(0);

2007-03-04 Thread Alexander Farber
Hello, is it maybe safe to call clearInterval(0) (same way as calling free(NULL) in C language) or should I better not rely on this? Here is my web chat function and I wonder if I could get rid of the very first line in it: var intervalID:Number = 0; var resp_lv:LoadVars = new LoadVars(); var

Re: [Flashcoders] clearInterval(0);

2007-03-04 Thread Adam Pasztory
Wow, lots of interval questions lately... :) I don't believe clearInterval(0) does anything. However, the code you posted looks correct. -Adam ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive:

Re: [Flashcoders] clearInterval(0);

2007-03-04 Thread Alain Rousseau
Well actually, clearInterval(0) clears the interval ID 0 lets say you have an interval defined : var myInt:Number = setInterval(this, doSomething, 1000); then it is possible that myInt = 0. The value of myInt is set by calling setInterval, which returns the ID of the interval, so doing