Re: [Flashcoders] small code question
Fumio Nonaka wrote: Using new Number is... silly. The Number-object is quite useless and can't be used for anything, that a regular number can't. Use normal numbers and use numbers: The Number object can have a property, which a regular number can't. I don't know if it is useful, though. I know - that's why.. silly :) It's useless. And it isn't even of primitive type number unless you invoke it's valueOf, which would automatically be invoked anyways in any calculations. Number-, Boolean- and String-objects (not primitives) are silly and useless :) -- Morten Barklund - Information Architect - Shockwaved Gothersgade 49, 4th floor - DK-1123 Copenhagen K, Denmark Phone: +45 7027 2227 - Fax: +45 3369 1174 ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Re: [Flashcoders] small code question
But why not? In the first example you say in the first line myVar = new Number(); But not more, only that it is a number e.g not a string or a bolean. Than in the second line you say myVar = 0; So you give it a Number. In the second example you do it in one way you say hey the variable myVar is a number and is a 0. See you Toon Van de Putte schrieb: I was wondering if the following two lines of code are just different ways of doing the same thing: var myVar = new Number(); myVar =0; var myVar= Number(0); -- Toon Van de Putte Pannenhuisstraat 63 2500 Lier Belgium mobile: +32 (0)497 52 74 51 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
