Hey no laughing - my point was that they support PHP, nothing more :P
On 6/23/06, Michael Stuhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mick G schrieb:
You can build a fully blown database driven site in Dreamweaver (allbeit
not
perfect code)
LOL
___
Depends on your knowledge level too
CF is dead easy to pick up - you can easily learn to create a CFC in no
time. The class based structure of PHP when creating a service throws a
couple people off in terms of scope resolution So depending on your
background if you know neither language,
But unless I am totally wrong, AMFPHP wasn't out of beta
until recently.
And it isn't officially supported by Adobe/MM, or if it is,
it wasn't until recently. CF is.
Macromedia doesn't support free technologies that are in direct
competition with their technologies. Why would they? If you
ColdFusion is a way for inexperienced coders to code
middleware. CF is nowhere near as good as .NET, PHP, Java or
Ruby. If you know how to code, don't waste your time with CF
and dive right in to one of the far better middleware
solutions (Ruby on Rails anyone?).
I would take issue
Macromedia doesn't support free technologies that are in direct
competition with their technologies. Why would they?
I always wondered why MM support PHP in Dreamweaver but refuse to do so for
Flash with a PHP remoting.
You can build a fully blown database driven site in Dreamweaver (allbeit
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Watts
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 1:38 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Best Flash data access way opinions
ColdFusion is a way for inexperienced coders to code
middleware. CF
I can't speak for Ruby, but unfortunately I've found CF is a
much harder sell over .NET only because of the cost, whereas
a lot of enterprises already have the infrastructure set up
to handle .NET applications so they've essentially already
paid for it. Plus, cost aside, convincing the
It's even hard to convince my dad to install Ruby on our webservers.
Don't that I really /care/ about Ruby either,I don't really like the
syntax of it. I would prefer Python over Ruby for sure. But I would use
.NET anytime where possible. The problem I mainly have with CF is that
it needs a
I thought Bank of America was a flagship CF environment!
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/showcase/index.cfm?event=casestud
ydetailcasestudyid=98723loc=en_us
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/proven/
But anyway, at this point I'm pretty much off-topic, so
this'll be my last response
I thought Bank of America was a flagship CF environment!
Bank of America has over 172,000 employees - so you can imagine we have
more than one server and more than one server admin. :) I haven't heard
CF mentioned once, but I've only been here 2 months. You sent those
Adobe links - that doesn't
I prefer PHP with Flash.
I find many PHP functions very easy to do the job that could take a
while doing within Flash.
I also feel PHP has a much larger support community.
-- Sajid
On 6/22/06, Merrill, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought Bank of America was a flagship CF environment!
Rails and JSON (http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/JSON+Webservice+Plugin)
-- because it's fun and your backend isn't bound to flash.
Regards,
Michael
On 6/22/06, Sajid Saiyed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I prefer PHP with Flash.
I find many PHP functions very easy to do the job that could
Take a look into amfphp and Flash Remoting at http://amfphp.org/
Mike Boutin
Jorge Antonio Diaz Gutierrez wrote:
Hi everyone:
There are differents ways to comunicate Flash Action Script with Data Bases.
One of the most used is XML generation trough PHP. I would like to hear about
Jorge:
I like using Flash Remoting with ColdFusion components for the following
reasons:
1. Fast development
2. Flexibility: using Remoting and CFCs, you can move a variety of data
types over the pipe
3. Extensibility
4. Maintainability
5. Fast data transfers (can be much more efficient than
AMFPHP is faster and easier to implement than CF Remoting, IMO.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Sacks
| BLITZ
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 3:00 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Best Flash data access way opinions
AMFPHP is faster and easier to implement than CF Remoting, IMO
AMFPHP is faster and easier to implement than CF Remoting, IMO.
How so?
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta,
Chicago, Baltimore, Northern
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dave Watts
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 12:16 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Best Flash data access way opinions
AMFPHP is faster and easier to implement than CF Remoting, IMO.
How so?
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
On Jun 21, 2006, at 3:11 PM, Jim Robson wrote:
I really don't think anything is faster to implement than CFCs and
Remoting.
You just build the CFC, set access=remote, and you're done on the
server
side.
I completely agree - especially when you are doing authentication and
serving
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave
Watts
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 12:16 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Best Flash data access way opinions
AMFPHP is faster and easier to implement than CF Remoting, IMO.
How so
20 matches
Mail list logo
