It can do limited cross domain xml loading (obeying crossdomain.xml
policy files of course), unlike the JavaScript XmlHttpRequest object. So
if nothing else, it could work as a client side proxy, for those that
can't run server side proxies, or just want less traffic to run through
their server
Doesn't work with Opera 9!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ryanm
Sent: 23 June 2006 09:35
To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Subject: [Flashcoders] Fjax... does this seem ridiculous to anyone else?
http://www.fjax.net/
ryanm
_
JAX Flash front-end can
be fitted to more back-ends.
Ville
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Britton
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 12:47
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Fjax... does this seem ridiculous to anyone e
: Friday, June 23, 2006 12:47
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Fjax... does this seem ridiculous to anyone else?
Seems like a hack to me, from both the AJAX programming and Flash
programming perspective.
Mike
___
Flashcoders
Of course I am not an ajax programmer, but if its as hard as they say, and
if it makes it easier for ajax programmers to code then why not?
Because it makes your web site dependant on the Flash plugin when it
doesn't need to be. You're trading the effort of browser compatibility for
the effo
So on my machine all I get from that link other than the top banner in
either FF or IE is:
"Error parsing XML Data"
First time that's happened. WTH?
Rich Rodecker wrote:
ridiculous? not really, i think its kind of slick, the idea to use
flash as your xml parser rather than the browser.
O
"Error parsing XML data" .. LOL!
The Digg Effect strikes again. Anyway, I don't think it's hard to use
conditional branching in your Javascript to account for browser
differences, but I think FJAX is a neat idea anyway.
Mark Luker
Illustration Design & Interactive Media
GREF-Southern Facilitie
ridiculous? not really, i think its kind of slick, the idea to use
flash as your xml parser rather than the browser.
Overblown? defintely. i think i can actually hear those guys
stroking themselves from here.
On 6/23/06, hank williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well... not really.
Of cour
Seems like a hack to me, from both the AJAX programming and Flash
programming perspective.
Mike
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
B
Well... not really.
Of course I am not an ajax programmer, but if its as hard as they say, and
if it makes it easier for ajax programmers to code then why not?
Hank
On 6/23/06, ryanm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.fjax.net/
ryanm
___
Flashco
10 matches
Mail list logo
