Sorry Dave... didn't see it.
On 5/25/2010 12:29 AM, Dave Watts wrote:
What if I have two computers? or what if I visualized the image and ran the
app twice? or what if I snoop the protocol? or what if I etc... I could
have a thousand sessions from one system and unless you track it in a db on
Is this a trick question?
:)
Karl
Sent from losPhone
On May 24, 2010, at 12:48 AM, Henrik Andersson he...@henke37.cjb.net
wrote:
Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
? so... let them cheat is what your saying?
Why do you even think that this is cheating?
On 24-05-2010 3:26, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
? so... let them cheat is what your saying?
On May 23, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Henrik Andersson wrote:
Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
You could count the different user agent strings. But browsers are
known to lie about it once in a while.
User agent
Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
Is this a trick question?
:)
No, I truly fail to see how this could be used for cheating.
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
I see. Well I'm going to bow out of that conversation because it is
OT and not the reason I posted the question.
I was actually researching for someone else, but thanks for the
input. Your point has been taken into consideration.
Best,
Karl
On May 24, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Henrik Andersson
You can prevent more that one login at the same time for the same
account; yet, you always have to consider an MITM attack being possible
unless you have a known pre-shared key system. In your DB, all you need
to do is keep track of how many users on a given network are connected,
or
What if I have two computers? or what if I visualized the image and ran
the app twice? or what if I snoop the protocol? or what if I etc... I
could have a thousand sessions from one system and unless you track it
in a db on the server the user is connecting to, you would never know it.
On
I would just spoof the headers.
On 5/24/2010 5:17 AM, kindaian wrote:
On 24-05-2010 3:26, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
? so... let them cheat is what your saying?
On May 23, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Henrik Andersson wrote:
Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
You could count the different user agent strings. But
Damned spell checker... I meant to say or what if I virtualized the
image and ran the app twice?
On 5/24/2010 8:05 PM, Anthony Pace wrote:
What if I have two computers? or what if I visualized the image and
ran the app twice? or what if I snoop the protocol? or what if I
etc... I could have
What if I have two computers? or what if I visualized the image and ran the
app twice? or what if I snoop the protocol? or what if I etc... I could
have a thousand sessions from one system and unless you track it in a db on
the server the user is connecting to, you would never know it.
I
Hi Cor,
Let me clarify a little more. How do I prevent multiple logins to my
site from one computer regardless of the user?
So that someone cant open safari and IE and log in to my site using
both browsers on that one computer.
Even if the usernames are different.
TIA
Karl
On May 23,
...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Karl
DeSaulniers
Sent: zondag 23 mei 2010 8:29
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Blocking multiple logins on one computer
Hi Cor,
Let me clarify a little more. How do I prevent multiple logins to my
site from one computer regardless of the user?
So
Let me clarify a little more. How do I prevent multiple logins to my site
from one computer regardless of the user?
So that someone cant open safari and IE and log in to my site using both
browsers on that one computer.
Even if the usernames are different.
I don't think you can guarantee
Thanks Dave,
That is the consensus I am getting.
Is there any way to tell how many browsers from one computer are
being used?
Or if a person is using a virtual machine or is sharing an ip?
Karl
On May 23, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Dave Watts wrote:
Let me clarify a little more. How do I prevent
Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
Thanks Dave,
That is the consensus I am getting.
Is there any way to tell how many browsers from one computer are being
used?
Or if a person is using a virtual machine or is sharing an ip?
You could count the different user agent strings. But browsers are known
to lie
You could also try using the LocalConnection class.
If you apps connect at some point, turn the second one off somehow.
Ktu
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.comwrote:
Thanks Dave,
That is the consensus I am getting.
Is there any way to tell how many
This is a gross hack (no offense intended), but I think it can actually
work... (except for virtual machines)
Cheers
Juan Pablo Califano
2010/5/23 Ktu ktu_fl...@cataclysmicrewind.com
You could also try using the LocalConnection class.
If you apps connect at some point, turn the second one
I agree on both points. Thanks guys.
What about setting up the lesson api to be an air app?
Would I be able to control this with an air app?
Karl
On May 23, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Juan Pablo Califano wrote:
This is a gross hack (no offense intended), but I think it can
actually
work... (except
? so... let them cheat is what your saying?
Karl
On May 23, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Henrik Andersson wrote:
Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
Thanks Dave,
That is the consensus I am getting.
Is there any way to tell how many browsers from one computer are
being
used?
Or if a person is using a virtual
I agree on both points. Thanks guys.
What about setting up the lesson api to be an air app?
Would I be able to control this with an air app?
Yeah, that should work, as the user will only be able to run one copy
of the app at a time unless you specifically design around that.
? so... let them cheat is what your saying?
There are no client security guarantees for web applications. You can
spend a lot of time fighting this, but if someone has enough incentive
to circumvent your limitations, they'll do it.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
I see. Hermmm.. ok.
Thanks everyone.
Karl
On May 23, 2010, at 9:37 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
? so... let them cheat is what your saying?
There are no client security guarantees for web applications. You can
spend a lot of time fighting this, but if someone has enough incentive
to circumvent
Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
? so... let them cheat is what your saying?
Why do you even think that this is cheating?
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
On Windows:
Delete all local accounts, but one and keep that password to yourself.
Also be sure to disable the Guest account.
HTH
Cor
-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Karl
DeSaulniers
Sent:
24 matches
Mail list logo
