On 08.10.2010 19:11, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
flashrom had an implicit erase-on-write for most flash chip and
programmer drivers, but it was not entirely consistent. Some drivers had
their own hand-rolled partial update functionality which made handling
partial updates from generic code
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:18:49AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
New version, updated to apply against current svn.
flashrom had an implicit erase-on-write for most flash chip and
^
On 10.07.2010 21:25, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 10.07.2010 20:16, Michael Karcher wrote:
The M29F400 stuff is completely broken. We use write_coreboot_m29f400bt
everywhere and write_m29f400bt is dead code. But
write_coreboot_m29f400bt does just write the lower half of the chip
flashrom had an implicit erase-on-write for most flash chip and
programmer drivers, but it was not entirely consistent. Some drivers had
their own hand-rolled partial update functionality which made handling
partial updates from generic code impossible.
Move implicit erase out of chip drivers,
On 10.07.2010 20:16, Michael Karcher wrote:
Am Samstag, den 22.05.2010, 03:26 +0200 schrieb Carl-Daniel Hailfinger:
[as requested on IRC, this is not a full review, but two things not
directly related to the patch stand out I don't want to leave
uncommented]
int
