Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] packet loss stats (#106)

> On Oct 16, 2017, at 10:16 PM, Dave Täht wrote: > > > Also, If there's a reason I should do my tests with iperf2 instead, I'm all > > ears, as I'm a "scientist," not attached to my own work. :) I read that > > they're > Cross checking is always good. True, don’t

Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] packet loss stats (#106)

Pete Heist writes: > Thanks! I made most of your changes (-o was particularly broken, so this is a > better solution), except: > > * I'm still thinking about whether to default durations to seconds or not. I'm > using Go's default duration flag parsing, and I like

Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] packet loss stats (#106)

Thanks! I made most of your changes (-o was particularly broken, so this is a better solution), except: - I'm still thinking about whether to default durations to seconds or not. I'm using Go's default duration flag parsing, and I like the explicitness of seeing the units. - I like that the