[Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] UDP averages seem off in batch output (#120)

I would prefer to think it was flent that was busted here rather than cake. Summary of rrul_be test run '100-10Mbit:nat:ack_filter' (at 2017-11-22 22:17:58.800917): avg median # data pts Ping (ms) ICMP: 0.86 0.88 ms

Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] packet loss stats (#106)

The owd data is already being collected, so it's fairly trivial to add the plots... -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] packet loss stats (#106)

Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: > Oh, and many thanks for your work on irtt, @peteheist! We really needed such a > tool :) Thx very much also. I'd really like to get some owd plots out of flent > > — > You are receiving this because you commented. > Reply to this

Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] packet loss stats (#106)

Pete Heist writes: > So I'm glad! Looking forward to playing with this more soon. Thanks > for all that refactoring too, looks like it was some real walking > through walls... Meh, it needed doing anyway. You just gave me a chance to repay a bit of technical debt ;)

Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] packet loss stats (#106)

Oh yeah, probably time for this issue thread to retire. :) So I'm glad! Looking forward to playing with this more soon. Thanks for all that refactoring too, looks like it was some real walking through walls... -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or

[Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] Using irtt for VoIP tests (#119)

Since we now have support for a nice UDP measurement tool in irtt, and also the ability to do fallback runner selection, we finally have an opportunity to retire D-ITG for VoIP measurements. This issue is a fork of the discussion from the old monster thread in #106 to deal specifically with

Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] packet loss stats (#106)

Oh, and many thanks for your work on irtt, @peteheist! We really needed such a tool :) -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] packet loss stats (#106)

> On Nov 22, 2017, at 8:49 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen > wrote: > > Pete Heist writes: > > >> > And this likely takes the mean value of all transactions and > >> > summarizes it at the end of the interval, then the calculated latency > >> >