Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] testing the behavior of small queue building non-ecn'd flows (#148)

2018-08-28 Thread Dave Täht
this convo is (purposefully) all over the place, but I'm leaning towards a rrul_v2 test with 10ms irtt intervals. Not clear to me if flent could deal with two different sample rates -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] testing the behavior of small queue building non-ecn'd flows (#148)

2018-08-28 Thread Pete Heist
Ah, I see TSDE is Pollere's work. I need to go through the talks referenced on pollere.net asap to get smarter on that. Will be on some roofs today though, p2p connection for the neighbors... -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] testing the behavior of small queue building non-ecn'd flows (#148)

2018-08-28 Thread Pete Heist
As for packet loss and reorders, there's the `lost` property on each `round_trip` that could be plotted, but for re-orders there's so far just a global `late_packets`, which is the number of packets who sequence number is lower than the previous one received. It would be possible to add a