On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 10:01 PM Dave Taht wrote:
> OT... Those latency numbers are spectacular. Any hint as to why? :)
>
Oh, I'm afraid the explanation is that we are hitting the BW limit on the
server rather than on the wifi. We are working on the process at the
moment. Will be switching over
OT... Those latency numbers are spectacular. Any hint as to why? :)
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022, 12:48 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Erik Taraldsen writes:
>
> > I'm trying to automate testing and graphing with flent. For my purposes
> it
> > probably will make sense to use CDF and box plots. Ho
Erik Taraldsen writes:
> I'm trying to automate testing and graphing with flent. For my purposes it
> probably will make sense to use CDF and box plots. However flent draws
> them differently. In the CDF plot the legend is off to the right. For box
> plot, the legend also is written verticall
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 2:12 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> So the way I usually do this is to drive all the client tests from a
> single Flent instance. There are two ways to do this: Run Flent on the
> server and connect to each client, running the test "in reverse", so to
> speak - the --
Erik Taraldsen writes:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 1:55 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
>>
>> You mean, when loading data sets A and B (in separate .flent.gz files),
>> you want a graph of total throughput A+B? No, that's not currently
>> supported, you can only plot data files separately...
>>
On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 1:55 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> You mean, when loading data sets A and B (in separate .flent.gz files),
> you want a graph of total throughput A+B? No, that's not currently
> supported, you can only plot data files separately...
>
That is what I want to achieve,
