Re: [Flent-users] [Cerowrt-devel] flent testers wanted prior to next release

2016-12-21 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Dave Taht writes: > I have not tried to get the qt5 support working on osx, but can > confirm qt4 has an ongoing bug with sizing the window appropriately. Right, so none of the workarounds help, then? Nuking them, in that case... -Toke ___ Flent-user

Re: [Flent-users] [Cerowrt-devel] flent testers wanted prior to next release

2016-12-21 Thread Dave Taht
The million dollar question is tho, is merely does flent from git work better than the past release on multi-cores?? (there's also some new keyboard navigation, you can go from tab to tab with cntrl- left,rightarrow and from plot to plot with cntrl-up/down arrow) I have not tried to get the qt5 s

Re: [Flent-users] [Cerowrt-devel] flent testers wanted prior to next release

2016-12-21 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi all, hi Rick, please see inlined text below. > On Dec 21, 2016, at 03:48, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote: > > The problem is flent is currently a Pet project, we need to it be cattle. > Being in an upstream repo (in a useable state... there are several > rhel/centos repo's with netperf... sans

Re: [Flent-users] [Cerowrt-devel] flent testers wanted prior to next release

2016-12-21 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Joel Wirāmu Pauling writes: > Also the range of tests requiring fairly complex setup of external > tools which rely on java (DTG-ITG) etc also causes a bit of a headache > to get a full functional test bench up and running. Yeah, D-ITG is a PITA. Suggestions for a better tool very welcome :) -T

Re: [Flent-users] [Cerowrt-devel] flent testers wanted prior to next release

2016-12-21 Thread Joel Wirāmu Pauling
My biggest bug bear is that reliance on netperf/netserver with -DEMO mode compilation time flag breaks compilation on recent RHEL and Fedora boxes due to recent GCC incompatibilities. Also the range of tests requiring fairly complex setup of external tools which rely on java (DTG-ITG) etc also cau

Re: [Flent-users] [Cerowrt-devel] flent testers wanted prior to next release

2016-12-21 Thread Joel Wirāmu Pauling
Best bet would be to get netserver into epel and fusionrpms . On 21/12/2016 3:16 PM, "Dave Taht" wrote: > I am cutting all the other lists off of this... > > yes, I have had to patch netperf for more recent versions of gcc - > getting rid of an inline, as I recall. Haven't tried to build it > re

Re: [Flent-users] [Cerowrt-devel] flent testers wanted prior to next release

2016-12-21 Thread Aaron Wood
That was what I needed to do for clang. -Aaron On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 18:16 Dave Taht wrote: > I am cutting all the other lists off of this... > > yes, I have had to patch netperf for more recent versions of gcc - > getting rid of an inline, as I recall. Haven't tried to build it > recently. I

Re: [Flent-users] [Cerowrt-devel] flent testers wanted prior to next release

2016-12-21 Thread Aaron Wood
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote: > My biggest bug bear is that reliance on netperf/netserver with -DEMO mode > compilation time flag breaks compilation on recent RHEL and Fedora boxes > due to recent GCC incompatibilities. > I ran into some issues on OSX due to the gc

Re: [Flent-users] [Cerowrt-devel] flent testers wanted prior to next release

2016-12-21 Thread Joel Wirāmu Pauling
The problem is flent is currently a Pet project, we need to it be cattle. Being in an upstream repo (in a useable state... there are several rhel/centos repo's with netperf... sans -DEMO functionality). So I can hand it to a Client and say 'here - this is the testsuite I recommend using, you can in

Re: [Flent-users] [Cerowrt-devel] flent testers wanted prior to next release

2016-12-20 Thread Dave Taht
I am cutting all the other lists off of this... yes, I have had to patch netperf for more recent versions of gcc - getting rid of an inline, as I recall. Haven't tried to build it recently. I can go look. I feel your pain re: RHEL and am glad you are chasing after fedora/etc. On Tue, Dec 20, 201