Closed #115.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/115#event-1344491474___
Flent-users mailing list
Flent-users@flent.org
http://fle
Ok. However, I'm wondering which tool is used in Fedora/CentOS community, then
(netperf isn't packaged in these systems)
Feel free to close this issue if you consider it's better.
Thanks
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view i
Osqui LittleRiver writes:
> Yes. Because it seems much more maintainedat least seeing its commit
> activity. But if you consider it isn't worthy, it's fine. Thanks.
iperf has many flaws being corrected, so you might view the commit
activity as a reflection of that. :)
netperf, on the other
Yes. Because it seems much more maintainedat least seeing its commit
activity. But if you consider it isn't worthy, it's fine. Thanks.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/iss
Iperf and netperf are not feature compatible, so that's not straight forward.
Why do you want to use iperf (I assume you mean for the TCP tests here, right?)?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.c
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/115___
Flent-users mailing list
Flent-users@flent.org
http://flent.org/mailman/listinf
