On 29/03/2023 19.42, ch wrote:
But the flent test itself never terminate. The process keeps running in
the background. Resulting in the test results being saved to disk.
Resulting in the test results *not* being saved to disk.
-ch
___
Flent-users
Hi Toke,
On 29/03/2023 16.34, ch wrote:
On 29/03/2023 14.33, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
Ah! Seems I introduced another infinite loop while fixing the previous
one; pushed another fix, please try that...
Haha,
Compiled the new version (acf8c41) and setup my scheduled
(flent-tests.sh)
On 29/03/2023 14.33, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
Ah! Seems I introduced another infinite loop while fixing the previous
one; pushed another fix, please try that...
Haha,
Compiled the new version (acf8c41) and setup my scheduled
(flent-tests.sh) job to run the bursts test (again).
ch writes:
> On 29/03/2023 12.10, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>> to run. Resulting in the node generating traffic for the full pipe for
>>> hours on end. My observation is the test does not terminate for unknown
>>> reasons.
>> Hmm, did you pull the latest version of traffic-gen? The version
On 29/03/2023 12.10, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
to run. Resulting in the node generating traffic for the full pipe for
hours on end. My observation is the test does not terminate for unknown
reasons.
Hmm, did you pull the latest version of traffic-gen? The version on
github had a bug where
ch writes:
> Hi Toke,
>
> On 28/03/2023 16.01, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Ah, dug out some emails which set me on the right path. Seems to be this
>> utility which, apparently, I wrote myself a decade ago, and then,
>> evidently, forgot all about:
>>
>>
Hi Toke,
On 28/03/2023 16.01, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
Ah, dug out some emails which set me on the right path. Seems to be this
utility which, apparently, I wrote myself a decade ago, and then,
evidently, forgot all about:
https://github.com/tohojo/traffic-gen
Seems to work well enough,
ch writes:
> [google foo]
>
> https://www.google.com/search?q=%22traffic-gen%22+flent
>
> The best that turned up are link to old 2016 posts,
>
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/make-wifi-fast/2016-March/000413.html
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath10k/2016-March/007101.html
>
[google foo]
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22traffic-gen%22+flent
The best that turned up are link to old 2016 posts,
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/make-wifi-fast/2016-March/000413.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath10k/2016-March/007101.html
Hi,
On 28/03/2023 14.39, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
The immediate API issue you're seeing is fixable (pushed a fix to github
just now), but TBH I am not sure which utility that test is trying to
run. :/
It's calling a 'traffic-gen' utility, which is not really a googlable
name, and for the
Chriztoffer writes:
> flent-users,
>
> When I try to run the "bursts" test, I get an error message
> complaining there is no command set for class SilentProcessRunner.
> Which leaves me a bit clueless, after trying to dig something forth
> from the github issue tracker. And looking at the source
11 matches
Mail list logo
