Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] Measure overhead of latency measurement flows (#78)

I didn't realize irtt had grown so feature complete! --hmac! lovely! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/78#issuecomment-40608___

Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] Measure overhead of latency measurement flows (#78)

Closed #78. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/78#event-1741016680___ Flent-users mailing list Flent-users@flent.org http://flent

Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] Measure overhead of latency measurement flows (#78)

Dave Täht writes: > measuring this would be helpful Any reason you can't just use irtt, in which case it is negligible? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/78#issuecommen

Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] Measure overhead of latency measurement flows (#78)

measuring this would be helpful -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/78#issuecomment-405732382___ Flent-users mailing list Flent-us