use
a different implemetation? If not, use a concrete
type.
-rg
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael
SchmalleSent: Friday, March 17, 2006 6:05 AMTo:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] AS3 :: Interface
type
:: Interface
type verses Concrete type return
Hello,The question I have is what is the general concensus
dealing with how you pass and type a property.Would you type a
property with a concerte type if it is used internally in a class ?Or
with say ArrayCollection, you need to type
:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] AS3 :: Interface
type verses Concrete type return
Hello,The question I have is what is the general concensus
dealing with how you pass and type a property.Would you type a
property with a concerte type if it is used internally in a class
implemetation? If not, use a concrete
type.
-rg
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael
SchmalleSent: Friday, March 17, 2006 6:05 AMTo:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] AS3 :: Interface
type verses Concrete
Hello,
The question I have is what is the general concensus dealing with how you pass and type a property.
Would you type a property with a concerte type if it is used internally in a class ?
Or with say ArrayCollection, you need to type it IListViewCollection?
I guess the real question is,
type.
-rg
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael
SchmalleSent: Friday, March 17, 2006 6:05 AMTo:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] AS3 :: Interface
type verses Concrete type return
Hello,The question I have is what is t
@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael
SchmalleSent: Friday, March 17, 2006 6:05 AMTo:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] AS3 :: Interface
type verses Concrete type return
Hello,The question I have is what is the general concensus
dealing with how you pass and type a property.Would you
7 matches
Mail list logo