I finally did some test again, it works as same as you said in last post, if
i keep adding data into the Dictionary, for the test3 case, it will be
garbage collected, if not keep adding data, it will not.
Thanks, i hope player team will find time to address this issue in a future
release of the pl
I see, thank you for the details Alex, seems it's a weak of Dictionary, hope
in future it'll be strong, i'll do more test to ensure the conclusion.
Thanks very much, i know the Dictionary more deeper now. :)
--
iiley
AsWing http://www.aswing.org
Personal http://www.iiley.com
s@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of iiley
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 2:16 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Dictionary weakKeys feature or it's a GC bug
I'v posted a bug report at
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform
I'v posted a bug report at
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform&product=17
Thanks
--
iiley
AsWing http://www.aswing.org
Personal http://www.iiley.com
OK, thank you Alex.
--
iiley
AsWing http://www.aswing.org
Personal http://www.iiley.com
t: Re: [flexcoders] Dictionary weakKeys feature or it's a GC bug
NO, the code does not generat new TestDic, but it keep DicCase instances
in an array, but did you see dic = new Dictionary(true);? it is the
ComplexObj instances container.
Yes, i use FB3 profiler, do you see this pic
NO, the code does not generat new *TestDic*, but it keep *DicCase* instances
in an array, but did you see *dic = new Dictionary(true);? *it is the
ComplexObj instances container.
Yes, i use FB3 profiler, do you see this picture:
http://demo.aswing.org/dictionary.gif
Thank you for keeping help me,
] On
Behalf Of iiley
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 6:29 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Dictionary weakKeys feature or it's a GC bug
Hi Alex,
Thanks very much for your deep analyse.
>Also, I haven't seen your test code
I
Hi Alex,
Thanks very much for your deep analyse.
>Also, I haven't seen your test code
I'v posted the test code in first post, well, maybe it's long so you don't
see it, i attached it here again.
In your analyse, there's misunderstood, i mean test2 and test3 methods in
the code:
public function
roups.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Dictionary weakKeys feature or it's a GC bug
I ran TestDic again for test3 method, it eat all my 2G ram after a
while. The key has no more referrence, so the value should be GCed,
well, however the GC is opportunistic, but why he did not f
I ran TestDic again for test3 method, it eat all my 2G ram after a while.
The key has no more referrence, so the value should be GCed, well, however
the GC is opportunistic, but why he did not find a chance to free some
memory till all 2G are eaten? Such a GC, i'm afraid to trust it. Or, there's
so
Hi Alex,
Thanks for discuss, but i don't agree with you.
I know GC is opportunistic, but it should be serviceable.
How do you think of the difference between test2 and test3?
--
iiley
AsWing http://www.aswing.org
Personal http://www.iiley.com
references.
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of iiley
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 11:01 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [flexcoders] Dictionary weakKeys feature or it's a GC bug
Hi list,
I'v done some tests man
Hi list,
I'v done some tests many days to understand how will Dictionary with
weakKeys works, but i can't understand some situations.
Here's my tested conclusion:
(for below, *weakObj* is a object that are not referrenced by any where)
*A*.These cases the weakObj will be garbage collected, memory
14 matches
Mail list logo
