This is not true, Google is able to parse Flash files, but the results
are offcourse not as good as for normal html.
An alternative is to "cloack" spiders, and redirect them to plain
content pages.
Sjors
Manish Jethani wrote:
Shell Bryson wrote:
> So far I've discovered; search engines ignore Fl
r time.
-David
> -Original Message-
> From: James Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 11:58 AM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Flex concerns
>
>
> Well we are actually building our entire website / portal i
Well we are actually building our entire website / portal in Flex. So
the search engine problem applies to us. Luckily we have a content
management system behind our portal so our solution is to hide an iframe
with a plain old indexable version of our site. Any links into that
iframe get redirected
Shell Bryson wrote:
So far I've discovered; search engines ignore Flex apps.
Thankfully! Search engines can't tell the difference between a webpage
with *content* (like a news article, a website with food recipes, etc.)
and a "web application", and they end up indexing the application
"contents"
TML page after
precompiling the MXML file. Yes, it doesn't support history management (that
does require JS to my knowledge), but it's a nicely working app nonetheless.
Thanks,
Matt Horn
From: Shell Bryson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, Ma
You bring up valid concerns, all of which I have had to deal with
because in 2.5 weeks my company is releasing our new website which is
entirely a Flex app! We have had to come up with a number of
workarounds and hacks. Some of which have been very painful. However,
anyone who has moved from the js
6 matches
Mail list logo
