RE: [flexcoders] Looping through sorted ObjectProxy

2007-04-18 Thread Peter Farland
lf Of bjorn - Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 3:18 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Looping through sorted ObjectProxy Actually, it doesn't .. If I look in my debugger - this is how the object looks: obj.stats = Object (@3ff4c81) [13] = Object (@3ff40c1) [14

Re: [flexcoders] Looping through sorted ObjectProxy

2007-04-17 Thread bjorn -
ferent results. You might have to find a way to get an array. -- *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *bjorn - *Sent:* Monday, April 16, 2007 12:06 PM *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com *Subject:* [flexcoders] Looping through sorted Objec

Re: [flexcoders] Looping through sorted ObjectProxy

2007-04-17 Thread bjorn -
Actually, it doesn't .. If I look in my debugger - this is how the object looks: obj.stats = Object (@3ff4c81) [13] = Object (@3ff40c1) [14] = Object (@40333c1) [15] = Object (@3ec07a1) [16] = Object (@a973301) The code: for( var i:String in obj.stats) { trace(i); } for each (

RE: [flexcoders] Looping through sorted ObjectProxy

2007-04-17 Thread Alex Harui
PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Looping through sorted ObjectProxy I'm getting a sorted ObjectProxy from a server. In my debugger it looks like this: obj.stats = Object (@b90e661) [51] = Object (@b90e541) [52] = Object (@b90e361) [1] = Object (@b90e121

Re: [flexcoders] Looping through sorted ObjectProxy

2007-04-16 Thread Bjorn Schultheiss
Hey Bjørn, "for in" loops in reverse. "for each" should give you what you need. regards, Bjorn On 17/04/2007, at 5:11 AM, bjorn - wrote: I'm getting a sorted ObjectProxy from a server. In my debugger it looks like this: obj.stats = Object (@b90e661) [51] = Object (@b90e541) [52] = O

[flexcoders] Looping through sorted ObjectProxy

2007-04-16 Thread bjorn -
I'm getting a sorted ObjectProxy from a server. In my debugger it looks like this: obj.stats = Object (@b90e661) [51] = Object (@b90e541) [52] = Object (@b90e361) [1] = Object (@b90e121) [2] = Object (@b90e9e1) (its week numbers linked to Objects, btw). However, when I use for() like this: for