: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 1:37 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Nested faceless components. keeping IDs and
DataBinding
Hi Matt,
Back posting huh!
Thx for the answer.
Now what I don't remember is if when we instantiate via the Array if
the
MXMLObject initialized
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Aldo Bucchi
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 1:37 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Nested faceless components. keeping IDs and
DataBinding
Hi Matt,
Back posting huh!
Thx for the answer.
Now what I don't remember
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Aldo Bucchi
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 1:00 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Nested faceless components. keeping IDs and
DataBinding
Matt,
Unless I have a bug in my compiler(s), I believe I cannot place inline
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Aldo Bucchi
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 3:25 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Nested faceless components. keeping IDs and
DataBinding
Hi all,
It would be great to have IDs and databinding available to faceless
data structures
PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Nested faceless components. keeping IDs and
DataBinding
Hi all,
It would be great to have IDs and databinding available to faceless
data structures.
Unfortunately, there are some restrictions that apply to faceless
components
Hi all,
It would be great to have IDs and databinding available to faceless
data structures.
Unfortunately, there are some restrictions that apply to faceless components.
Is there any (hacky) way to declare a nested faceless component in an
MXML document and assign a document scoped ID to it ??
6 matches
Mail list logo