RE: [flexcoders] OH, For the love of all that's good, please help!

2005-08-25 Thread Rick Bullotta
: [flexcoders] OH, For the love of all that's good, please help! I ran into this as well. Looking at the SOAP encoded message, it appeared to me that flex wasn't making clean SOAP (pun definitely intended). When we switched over to using the CFC's RemoteObject instead of the WebService, things

RE: [flexcoders] OH, For the love of all that's good, please help!

2005-08-25 Thread bsd
: [flexcoders] OH, For the love of all that's good, please help! I ran into this as well. Looking at the SOAP encoded message, it appeared to me that flex wasn't making clean SOAP (pun definitely intended). When we switched over to using the CFC's RemoteObject instead of the WebService

RE: [flexcoders] OH, For the love of all that's good, please help!

2005-08-25 Thread Rick Bullotta
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] OH, For the love of all that's good, please help! Where do I make the change to this setting? From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Rick Bullotta Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 8:00

[flexcoders] OH, For the love of all that's good, please help!

2005-08-23 Thread bsd
Im still trying to figure this out. Anyone whos had experience with this issue and found a solution, your help would be appreciated I'm passing an array from Flex to a web service located in a CFC. It returns an error that states: org.xml.sax.SAXException: No deserializer for

Re: [flexcoders] OH, For the love of all that's good, please help!

2005-08-23 Thread Sean McKibben
I ran into this as well. Looking at the SOAP encoded message, it appeared to me that flex wasn't making clean SOAP (pun definitely intended).When we switched over to using the CFC's RemoteObject instead of the WebService, things started working again. Wasn't too hard of a switch, and I'll take