Re: [flexcoders] Re: AJAX versus Flex

2006-05-26 Thread Kevin Newman
Can you do that with SVG (I'm assuming you can with SWF)? If so, would that fill the gap to make MXML+SVG into a platform XML dialect for UIs? Kevin N. pk_wasp wrote: > MXML is more of an application framework XML language > > e.g. you can't define low level graphics such as shapes, gradient

Re: [flexcoders] Re: AJAX versus Flex

2006-05-26 Thread Michael Schmalle
I am sure that is on the list. MikeOn 5/26/06, pk_wasp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: MXML is more of an application framework XML language e.g. you can't define low level graphics such as shapes, gradients etc via markup like you can with XAML. --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Jim Robso

[flexcoders] Re: AJAX versus Flex

2006-05-26 Thread pk_wasp
MXML is more of an application framework XML language e.g. you can't define low level graphics such as shapes, gradients etc via markup like you can with XAML. --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Jim Robson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Also I think for the Flash Platform to be a true pl

RE: [flexcoders] Re: AJAX versus Flex

2006-05-26 Thread Jim Robson
>Also I think for the Flash Platform to be a true platform, it really >needs a platform XML dialect for UIs –   Isn’t that what MXML is? -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.co

[flexcoders] Re: AJAX versus Flex

2006-05-26 Thread pk_wasp
I don't think its particularly hard to convince internal management to consider Flex as a viable RIA/Enterprise solution. The main problem/resistance we are finding is from our clients/customers opposing I.T architects who either get upset if we suggest Flex as a solution, or say they never