[flexcoders] Re: Common base class for components

2009-01-30 Thread Amy
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Marco Catunda wrote: > > I've just read this article. Very nice... > > Does anyone could explain me or point me some URL about the correct > flow of Flex building components methods calls. I've never seen any > documentation about it. > > As far as I understan

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Common base class for components

2009-01-30 Thread Gregor Kiddie
please contact is.helpd...@inps.co.uk From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcod...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Marco Catunda Sent: 30 January 2009 15:32 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Common base class for components I've

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Common base class for components

2009-01-30 Thread Marco Catunda
I've just read this article. Very nice... Does anyone could explain me or point me some URL about the correct flow of Flex building components methods calls. I've never seen any documentation about it. As far as I understand, after invalidateProperties method, the further calls will happen commi

[flexcoders] Re: Common base class for components

2009-01-30 Thread Amy
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Martyn Bowis wrote: > > Hi Jules, > > Object Oriented programming in my mind is about making use of references > to objects. With this in mind, here is a way I use to centralise common > functionality (functions) that I can access throughout my application

[flexcoders] Re: Common base class for components

2009-01-30 Thread Amy
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Jules Suggate wrote: > > Is it possible for an MXML file to implement an interface? Sounds intriguing > ... but won't resolve my issue unfortunately. It's the implementation code > that I want them to share. > > I have developers on my team who are less than

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Common base class for components

2009-01-29 Thread Jules Suggate
Now that's more like what i'm talking about! I've been coding for 12 hours now, so the article looks like random tokens on a page to me right now... but will take a look first thing in the morning!! Thanks Amy :-) On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 05:00, Amy wrote: > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com ,

[flexcoders] Re: Common base class for components

2009-01-29 Thread Amy
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Jules Suggate wrote: > > Just to resume this thread, what I meant was to still use MXML and all the > Flex components, but to introduce common functionality to all our Views > (mxml files). Perhaps it's better to think of weaving this in than using > inherita