and then this hits the airwaves
http://www.graniteds.org/confluence/display/INTRO/Granite+Data+Services+Overview
I'd like to say 3 things at this point:
1) I'm not trolling by chipping in here. My bottom line is to use
powerful technology to solve serious problems that the boss will sign
off
Oh boy, do I feel your pain...
1) Without breaking the licensing agreement I don't see any way round it
2) It is a potentially very valuable piece of technology, but I am
increasingly questioning it, especially as it is is largely unproven
and still pretty wobbly (and confusing). It will be
We don't use FDS. There are many alternatives like WebORB, OpenAMF, Red5,
AMFPHP, Fluorine.
http://www.themidnightcoders.com/weborb/
http://osflash.org/projects
And of course Flex supports Web Services, XML over HTTP, XMLSocket, binary
Socket, and other communication mechanisms.
In our
, 2007 10:47 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: FDS licensing
Oh boy, do I feel your pain...
1) Without breaking the licensing agreement I don't see any way round it
2) It is a potentially very valuable piece of technology, but I am
increasingly questioning it, especially
I'm in the game for some years now and use AMFPHP, OpenAMF, and other
products and without entering in price comments I must say that LCDS is
other world in terms of RIA productivity and posibilities. The Flexibility
and features are simply not comparable rigth now, is like comparing AJAX and
about changes right now.
Matt
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of simonjpalmer
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 10:47 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: FDS licensing
Oh boy, do I feel your
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of simonjpalmer
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 2:48 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: FDS licensing
Thanks for chipping in Matt, I appreciate your input, and I hope I
have
7 matches
Mail list logo
