.
-rJesterXL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enterprise Services = da Bomb
- Original Message -
From: Robert Thompson
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: FLEX Partnership Opportunity
Except for cases of RemoteObject and better
JesterXL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enterprise Services = da Bomb
- Original Message -
From: Robert Thompson
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: FLEX Partnership Opportunity
Except for cases of RemoteObject
Alexander, give me an idea of what that license usually retails for?
and how are you currently using it, is it hosting anything?
Thanks.
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Alex Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello developers,
I own a 4 cpu Flex license which apparently cannot be sold and
Please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] I cannot give pricing info
over here.
Currently they are not being used at all.
Thanks,
Alex
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, jperedo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander, give me an idea of what that license usually retails
for?
and how are you
Except for cases of RemoteObject and better J2EE integration, why wouldn't someone stick to a Flex2 client consuming doc based Web Services or use of HTTPService?
I would be interested in general test bed open project types of activities for the J2EE implementations.Alex Alex [EMAIL
Enterprise Services = da Bomb
- Original Message -
From: Robert Thompson
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: FLEX Partnership
Opportunity
Except for cases of RemoteObject and better J2EE integration, why
6 matches
Mail list logo
