just trying
to do
> > push over HTTP?
> >
> >
> >
> > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Matt
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:04 PM
> > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
>
gt; push over HTTP?
>
>
>
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Matt
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:04 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Socket to Port 80
>
>
>
>
oses of locating a policy
> > file you do use the xmlsocket://myserver as
> the protocol in the URL to
> > loadPolicyFile.
> >
> > Pete
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________
> >
> > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
You make a good point, there are other ways of doing this, but
performance in communication is the most important reason I started
using a Socket. I was originally using an HTTPService to deal with
two-way communication but the performance was not nearly as good as a
direct socket. Don't get me w
to do
push over HTTP?
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:04 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Socket to Port 80
If I'm understanding the way the xmlsocket:/
as i said its a guess. red5 implemented a mina server to listen to the rtmp
(and rtmpt) protocol, trying that with a custom socket instead of a
netconnection might fail, but then again you could send data via a
netconnection as well (remote shared objects do this). actually a good hard
look at red
gt; Pete
>
>
>
>
>
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Paul DeCoursey
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 12:16 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Socket to Port 80
>
m: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Paul DeCoursey
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 12:16 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Socket to Port 80
>
>
>
> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogr
yserver as the protocol in the URL to
> loadPolicyFile.
>
> Pete
>
>
>
>
>
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Paul DeCoursey
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 12:16 PM
> To:
07 12:16 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Socket to Port 80
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
, "Peter Farland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > I'll give this a try, but I'm not
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Farland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > I'll give this a try, but I'm not actually using
> > XMLSocketbut a straight Socket ...
>
> [Pete] I did see that, but was looking around at samples for loading
> custom policy files over a socket and must have
> I'll give this a try, but I'm not actually using
> XMLSocketbut a straight Socket ...
[Pete] I did see that, but was looking around at samples for loading
custom policy files over a socket and must have cut and pasted one that
included the xmlsocket: in the protocol. But protocols aside, I thin
I'll give this a try, but I'm not actually using XMLSocket but a
straight Socket (and I wrote code in ActionScript to send an HTTP post
header and a Servlet to process the input and then begin the streaming
of data). Do I need to pass a different protocol for a straight socket?
I've been baffled b
I've never used RTMP, so I'm looking into that now. Essentially my
goal here is to have a two-way communication between the flash client
and my web server via port 80. I don't particularly care how I
accomplish that so long as it works. ;)
Thanks for the tip and if you have any examples using RTMP
14 matches
Mail list logo
