Re: [flexcoders] Re: TreeDataProvider implementation

2005-06-13 Thread Sean McKibben
I think the main reason I think I need to make my own TreeDataProvider is that the CF object persistence backend I'm integrating with requires that I send back deleted objects with a property, deleted=true. So there will be a bunch of objects which I don't want to show in my tree data with delete

[flexcoders] Re: TreeDataProvider implementation

2005-06-13 Thread alex_harui
TreeDataProvider is advanced stuff. Why do you think you need your own? Give a little context and we'll see. We currently handle XML and object graphs pretty well. Also the code for two TreeDataProviders in shipped in Flash MX 2004 in mx\controls\treeClasses --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.c