On Tuesday 21 Jul 2009, Yesaya handoyo wrote:
> Ic,how about using swfaddress?Is it the same?For the bug?
Dunno, as I said we use use the Adobe solution as the preloader issue doesn't
bother us.
--
Helping to augmentatively seize viral mission-critical metrics as part of the
IT team of the yea
Ic,how about using swfaddress?Is it the same?For the bug?
On 7/21/09, Tom Chiverton wrote:
> On Monday 20 Jul 2009, Yesaya handoyo wrote:
>> Thanks Tom,are there any disadvantage using deep linking??
>
> Currently there is a player bug where it prevents 'streaming' which may
> effect
> any custom
On Monday 20 Jul 2009, Yesaya handoyo wrote:
> Thanks Tom,are there any disadvantage using deep linking??
Currently there is a player bug where it prevents 'streaming' which may effect
any custom preloaders you have. I didn't find it a problem, given how nice
Deep Linking is for users.
--
Help
Thanks Tom,are there any disadvantage using deep linking??
On 7/20/09, Tom Chiverton wrote:
> On Sunday 19 Jul 2009, yonghan79 wrote:
>> Hi all,i want to ask does anyone ever before create flex 3 application
>> that
>> for example i click on the menu testing then the address on the browser
>> add
On Sunday 19 Jul 2009, yonghan79 wrote:
> Hi all,i want to ask does anyone ever before create flex 3 application that
> for example i click on the menu testing then the address on the browser
> address will be like www.example123.com/#/testing,
This is Deep Linking -
http://livedocs.adobe.com/fle
Hi all,i want to ask does anyone ever before create flex 3 application that for
example i click on the menu testing then the address on the browser address
will be like www.example123.com/#/testing,when i click on the example,it will
be www.example123.com/#/example...Similiar in the php based ap
6 matches
Mail list logo
