Re: [flexcoders] Accessing public function from a different mxml

I can't say that I fully understand the distinction between the two, but I have found that sometimes this.parentDocument works better than this.parent Hope that helps, Sid - Original Message From: andrewedwards39 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, July

RE: [flexcoders] Accessing public function from a different mxml

@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sid Maskit Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 3:40 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Accessing public function from a different mxml I can't say that I fully understand the distinction between the two, but I have found

RE: [flexcoders] Accessing public function from a different mxml

Try using parentDocument instead of parent to go up the MXML hierarchy. Or try dotting down from the Application instance: Application.application.foo.bar.a.pubfunction(). Gordon Smith Adobe Flex SDK Team From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com

RE: [flexcoders] Accessing public function from a different mxml

. Tracy From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sid Maskit Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 3:40 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Accessing public function from a different mxml I can't say that I fully

RE: [flexcoders] Accessing public function from a different mxml

From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 2:13 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Accessing public function from a different mxml I'm working on the same issue right now

RE: {Disarmed} RE: [flexcoders] Accessing public function from a different mxml

, July 15, 2008 2:08 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: {Disarmed} RE: [flexcoders] Accessing public function from a different mxml This may be the time to learn about the singleton pattern/class if you are not familiar with it. I discovered its benefits only recently, and it is quite