RE: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing

: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing yeah... i add incremental but for some reason it still takes between 8 and 20 seconds. the output from mxmlc is as follows Files: 546 Time: 8458ms Linking... 100ms Optimizing... 901ms SWF Encoding... 180ms Persisting 114 compilation units... 160ms

Re: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing

issue, the same is true for PC) Dirk.-Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Alisdair Mills Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 7:39 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developingyeah... i add

RE: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing

. From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alisdair Mills Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 9:30 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing thanks for explaining

Re: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing

voke the process for a given project it looks like   eclipse.incrementalBuild project="MyProject" / This not only works for Flex but for all projects that use incremental project builders. Dirk.   From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoog

RE: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing

Check if the eclipse.incrementalBuild task exists. Go to Window -- Preferences -- Ant-- Runtime -- Tasks Tab, there should be some eclipse.xyz tasks listed, including eclipse.incrementalBuild. If not, the your Ant integration in Eclipse doesn't seem to setup correctly. Also make sure

Re: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing

thanks Dirk, didn't have it running in the same VM... it now runs without complaining... but doesn't compile anything. hmm - i'll persist with playing with it to see if i can get it working. thanks for your help.cheers, AlOn 24 Mar 2006, at 11:06, Dirk Eismann wrote: Check if the

RE: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing

: Friday, March 24, 2006 1:39 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing yeah... i add incremental but for some reason it still takes between 8 and 20 seconds. the output from mxmlc is as follows Files: 546 Time: 8458ms Linking... 100ms Optimizing

Re: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing

] On Behalf Of Alisdair Mills Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 1:39 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing yeah... i add incremental but for some reason it still takes between 8 and 20 seconds. the output from mxmlc is as follows Files: 546 Time

RE: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing

I didn't see whether you specified 1.X or 2.0, and I'm sure someone else will be better able to speak about Flex 1.X, but I might be able to offer some insights for Flex 2.0. I'm a PC guy myself but my colleague is currently working on a Mac running Eclipse with the FlexBuilder 2

Re: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing

I develop flex 2.0 on a mac with flex builder beta 1 i had a great set up by copying the files from the windows plugin. for me the debug view worked perfectly. For editing i used the oxygen plugin as the flex builder one for mxml crashed eclipse and the AS editor had a cursor that jumped

Re: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing

Hi Richard, I would love to have that class if it's saves time. Of course, I can use the Windows version of Flex but the dockbar and quicksilver are so awesome to work with. Anyway hopefully they will support the Mac in Beta 3!!! Yours, Weyert I didn't see whether you specified 1.X or 2.0,

Re: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing

fyi, we now have an SDK download for Windows, Mac and Linux: http://www.macromedia.com/cfusion/entitlement/index.cfm?e=labs#flexsdk2 (no more having to copy from windows) mike chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Richard Leggett wrote: I didn't see whether you specified 1.X or 2.0, and I'm sure

Re: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing

Mike, just out of interest... is there any way to get the SDK compiler to compile as quickly as the compiler in flex builder? Using flex builder beta 1 as a guide it would take 1 second or so in flex builder but up to 20 seconds with the command line mxmlc compiler... quite a difference. I

RE: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing

. -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alisdair Mills Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 5:23 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing Mike, just out of interest... is there any way to get the SDK

Re: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing

mind you, dual boot to xp on intel-based mac is now proven :)best of both world ? On 3/24/06, Jonathan Miranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hmm, so what you're telling me is I shouldn't get an iMacPro laptop unless I can get it to dual-boot OSX/XP ;)_Jonathan

Re: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing

Make sure you are doing incremental compiles by passing: --incremental=true on the command line. mike chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alisdair Mills wrote: Mike, just out of interest... is there any way to get the SDK compiler to compile as quickly as the compiler in flex builder? Using

Re: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing

yeah... i add incremental but for some reason it still takes between 8 and 20 seconds. the output from mxmlc is as follows Files: 546 Time: 8458ms Linking... 100ms Optimizing... 901ms SWF Encoding... 180ms Persisting 114 compilation units... 160ms Total time: 12607ms am i doing something

Re: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing

What are the specs on your mac and pc? mike chambers Alisdair Mills wrote: yeah... i add incremental but for some reason it still takes between 8 and 20 seconds. the output from mxmlc is as follows Files: 546 Time: 8458ms Linking... 100ms Optimizing... 901ms SWF Encoding... 180ms