Re: [flexcoders] Question about binding via AS

I've been poking around sanity-checking some code I'm working on for my DI package, and posted my conclusions and thoughts here: http://is.gd/2tAu -Josh On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Josh McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd say if A is long-lived you'd definitely want to keep a reference

RE: [flexcoders] Question about binding via AS

I think you have to call unwatch otherwise the CW may not get GC'd From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josh McDonald Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 10:57 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Question about

Re: [flexcoders] Question about binding via AS

When u create a binding from object A to B, a reference is added to A. (A keeps a reference to B). It will not be garbage collected until you unwatch the changeWatcher it or delete A. So if your concern is whether u need to keep a reference to ChangeWatcher object returned by mx.binding.utils

Re: [flexcoders] Question about binding via AS

I'd say if A is long-lived you'd definitely want to keep a reference to the watcher so you can unwatch it, or at least re-use it :) Just thinking of the best way to have an editor component have the VO injected but still be able to know when the entire object is replaced behind its back. I think