They used a dummy AS class and put the documentation in it. You can
ASDoc with MXML, but it doesn't work well. The two biggest problems
with using MXML and ASDoc is that you can't define class-level comments
(and using mx:Metadata doesn't get around that but will work elsewhere)
and that so many variables are public. -Brian
________________________________
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of borekbe
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 12:16 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: ASDoc for MXML components?
That's what I did - I searched for *.mxml inside Flex source and
the
RichTextEditor.mxml is the only component in the whole framework
defined in MXML.
But to my surprise, there is absolutely no documentation. How
did the
Flex team worked around this situation?
Borek
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , "Daniel Freiman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> It looks like the mx:Metadata tag might also allows for
comments, but i
> haven't personally confirmed that. See RichTextEditor.mxml for
what I'm
> talking about.
>
> Daniel Freiman
> nondocs <http://nondocs.blogspot.com
<http://nondocs.blogspot.com> >
