coders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Crash of safari, firefox using
XML.setChildren for XML in a XMLListCollection
I think the OP was attempting to delete all of the childern of a node by
assigning an empty XMLList. While this seems reasonable, I do not
believe it will work, at least, I was una
I think the OP was attempting to delete all of the childern of a node by
assigning an empty XMLList. While this seems reasonable, I do not
believe it will work, at least, I was unable to do it this way.
Tracy
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL
The docs are a bit misleading when it comes to XML. Try using XML with
the tree, it works great.
The warnings occur because most of the properties you deal with are
dynamic objects, which are not bindable. Solve that by casting(object
as XML) or converting(XML(object)) the object to the und
acy Spratt
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 12:35 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Crash of safari, firefox using
XML.setChildren for XML in a XMLListCollection
First, if you are using a tree, why have you chosen XMLListCollection
instead of XML. For hierarchical d
First, if you are using a tree, why have you chosen XMLListCollection
instead of XML. For hierarchical data, XML is easier to work with than
nested collections.
Next, you say, "XML doesn't send notifications". Why do you say that?
And exactly what do you mean? XML is bindable.
If you are
5 matches
Mail list logo
