RE: [flexcoders] Re: Follow-up on the watermark thing

2007-09-15 Thread Matt Chotin
It's not node-locked so you should be fine. From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Luebcke Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 2:21 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Follow-up on the watermark thing It certainly worked for me. St

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Follow-up on the watermark thing

2007-09-15 Thread Matt Chotin
, Matt From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott - FastLane Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 12:46 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Follow-up on the watermark thing So... I want to make sure I am hearing this correctly. Are

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Follow-up on the watermark thing

2007-09-14 Thread Scott - FastLane
So... I want to make sure I am hearing this correctly. Are you saying that if you have a flex2 charting license, and you put it into license.properties of flex3 sdk, then build from command line you can get rid of the watermark? I spent literally 3 hours on the phone with Adobe sales/tech. su

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Follow-up on the watermark thing

2007-09-14 Thread Scott - FastLane
Chris - My bad... I thought you were saying you couldn't build at all from the cmd line. Sorry for the confusion. Scott Chris Luebcke wrote: Thanks Scott--I already have the ant build working, and I'm using the exact same datavisualization.swc in the ant build--I picked it up out of the Fl

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Follow-up on the watermark thing

2007-09-14 Thread Matt Chotin
Have you put the serial number in your license.properties file in the frameworks folder? From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Luebcke Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 11:54 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Follow-up on the wate