Re: [flexcoders] Re: HTTPService or URLRequest Request header Question

2008-02-11 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Friday 08 Feb 2008, Jeff Vroom wrote: > Anyone know if this works if your browser needs to use a proxy server to > connect to the internet? If someone has a simple demo SWF (say, fetching the google home page) I'll try it here and let you know. -- Tom Chiverton Helping to heterogeneously max

RE: [flexcoders] Re: HTTPService or URLRequest Request header Question

2008-02-08 Thread Jeff Vroom
Anyone know if this works if your browser needs to use a proxy server to connect to the internet? Jeff From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of scott.royston Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 11:30 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogrou

RE: [flexcoders] Re: HTTPService or URLRequest Request header Question

2008-02-08 Thread Seth Hodgson
Use the proxy service that ships in BlazeDS and LCDS for your Http requests. There are a variety of browser hacks related to Http headers (which in some cases also impact SOAP web services), and the player is likely to get more restrictive in this area rather than less. This generally has more t

Re: [flexcoders] Re: HTTPService or URLRequest Request header Question

2008-02-08 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Friday 08 Feb 2008, Guolong Li wrote: > The socket worked. Still feel adobe is steping > backward in this aspect. No value added other than > make life a little more miserable. I don't understand why they've done it either. I suggest you log a bug with your business case and encourage us all to

Re: [flexcoders] Re: HTTPService or URLRequest Request header Question

2008-02-08 Thread Guolong Li
The socket worked. Still feel adobe is steping backward in this aspect. No value added other than make life a little more miserable. --- Tom Chiverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 07 Feb 2008, gli1_2000 wrote: > > Then what is a possible alternative to get around > this? Anyone has > >

Re: [flexcoders] Re: HTTPService or URLRequest Request header Question

2008-02-08 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Thursday 07 Feb 2008, gli1_2000 wrote: > Then what is a possible alternative to get around this? Anyone has > suggestions? Talk to Socket directly, or rewrite the remote service. -- Tom Chiverton Helping to assertively create industry-wide customers on: http://thefalken.livejournal.com *